MTT/ED/AP/LEO Societies Joint Chapter United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland Section. 1999 High Frequency Postgraduate Student
DOI: 10.1109/hfpsc.1999.809284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flip chip interconnect analysis at millimetre wave frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common opinion is that MMICs designed in coplanar transmission line technology (coplanar waveguide, CPW) have a high compatibility with flip-chip mounting technology, while microstrip (MS) MMICs are not compatible. Various studies in the past have demonstrated design rules for finding the optimum bump height, distance or shape [2,3] in order to minimize the transition loss. In this paper, the proximity effect corresponding to the distance between chip and substrate is examined for both microstrip and coplanar MMICs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common opinion is that MMICs designed in coplanar transmission line technology (coplanar waveguide, CPW) have a high compatibility with flip-chip mounting technology, while microstrip (MS) MMICs are not compatible. Various studies in the past have demonstrated design rules for finding the optimum bump height, distance or shape [2,3] in order to minimize the transition loss. In this paper, the proximity effect corresponding to the distance between chip and substrate is examined for both microstrip and coplanar MMICs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this interaction, the minimal separation between two face-to-face chips should be no less than 0.3 times the CPW ground-to-ground spacing [20]. For the microstrip circuits, two chips need to be separated farther apart, due to the field distribution of microstrip.…”
Section: Flip-chip Based Vertical Rf Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%