2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2381-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FLO gene-dependent phenotypes in industrial wine yeast strains

Abstract: Most commercial yeast strains are nonflocculent. However, controlled flocculation phenotypes could provide significant benefits to many fermentation-based industries. In nonflocculent laboratory strains, it has been demonstrated that it is possible to adjust flocculation and adhesion phenotypes to desired specifications by altering expression of the otherwise silent but dominant flocculation (FLO) genes. However, FLO genes are characterized by high allele heterogeneity and are subjected to epigenetic regulatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
35
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the aggregates are calcium independent and are not inhibited by the presence of sugars (glucose, mannose, maltose or sucrose); these facts suggest a cell-cell interaction mechanism different than those observed in the brewing yeast cells. On the other hand, Bayly et al (2005) reported Ca dependence and mannose inhibition of Flo11p-dependent flocculation, while other authors did not observe a flocculent phenotype in strains overexpressing FLO11 gene (Verstrepen and Klis 2006;Govender et al 2008;Mulders et al 2009;Govender et al 2010). These data are consistent with our possibility: although the presence of Flop on yeast cell wall seems to be important on the determination of the percentage of cell hydrophobicity, the degree of yeast flocculation is not related with the level of hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the aggregates are calcium independent and are not inhibited by the presence of sugars (glucose, mannose, maltose or sucrose); these facts suggest a cell-cell interaction mechanism different than those observed in the brewing yeast cells. On the other hand, Bayly et al (2005) reported Ca dependence and mannose inhibition of Flo11p-dependent flocculation, while other authors did not observe a flocculent phenotype in strains overexpressing FLO11 gene (Verstrepen and Klis 2006;Govender et al 2008;Mulders et al 2009;Govender et al 2010). These data are consistent with our possibility: although the presence of Flop on yeast cell wall seems to be important on the determination of the percentage of cell hydrophobicity, the degree of yeast flocculation is not related with the level of hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the present work, it was shown that brewing and constitutively flocculent strains displayed a similar flocculation degree (>97%) and a different percentage of hydrophobicity; the brewing strains were ∼2.5-3 times more hydrophobic than the strain S646-1B. On the other hand, CSH alone seems not to be sufficient to provide calcium-dependent and sugar-sensitive flocculation because strains expressing FLO11 presented a high CSH but did not yield a flocculent phenotype (Mulders et al 2009;Govender et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in FLO11, namely, a deletion in the promoter region which enhances the expression of FLO11 and an increase in the number of tandem repeat sequences in the central domain, caused these "flor yeast" cells to float and form buoyant biofilms, particularly in sherry wines (85,86). Regulation of FLO gene expression is remarkably complex and generates the basis for strain-to-strain differences that can cause problems on the industrial scale (87). Several FLO genes, FLO1, FLO5, FLO9, and FLO10, are located at telomeres.…”
Section: Genetic Strain Improvement Of Lager Yeastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactivation of FLO8 in laboratory strains of S288c (due to a premature stop codon) results in lack of FLO11 expression and flocculation (91). To ensure timely flocculation at the end of fermentation in wine yeast strains, FLO genes were placed under the control of stationary-phase-induced promoters derived from ADH2 or HSP30 (87). Taken together, flocculation is a highly evolvable trait in which specific flocculation properties can be selected via conventional yeast breeding.…”
Section: Genetic Strain Improvement Of Lager Yeastmentioning
confidence: 99%