1952
DOI: 10.1021/ie50516a026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floc in Carbonated Beverages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beet and cane flocs can appear as turbidity or as "cotton ball floc" Beet sugar floc is more granular in appearance and less fluffy than cane sugar floc . Beet sugar floc long has been ascribed to saponins (Eis et al 1952;van der Poel et al 1966;Carruthers et a!. 1967), but in our tests, authentic saponin added to non-floccing sug ars in amounts approximating those reported in floccing sugar did not nec essarily produce floc.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beet and cane flocs can appear as turbidity or as "cotton ball floc" Beet sugar floc is more granular in appearance and less fluffy than cane sugar floc . Beet sugar floc long has been ascribed to saponins (Eis et al 1952;van der Poel et al 1966;Carruthers et a!. 1967), but in our tests, authentic saponin added to non-floccing sug ars in amounts approximating those reported in floccing sugar did not nec essarily produce floc.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The observations on hydrolysis explain why Eis (1952) observed floc culation only after adding back a relatively large quantity of isolated floc material. The amount added probably was sufficient to form a haze rather than a true floc .…”
Section: Beverage Flocmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gaining knowledge about sugar beet saponins and their properties has long been and is still very important as they are mainly responsible for the formation of foam during sugar fabrication and also for turbidity, called floc, in acidic sugar solutions. , The total saponin content in different matrices was determined and facilitated the process optimization, but former methods are all out of date and nonspecific. The most frequently used method was the antimony pentachloride test that cannot distinguish between saponins and oleanolic acid as well as several other substances which were all considered as the saponin content. Polarographic methods have the disadvantage that they are not specific for saponins .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eis et al (1952) identified the causative agent for floc production in beet sugar as a saponin. Eis et al (1952) identified the causative agent for floc production in beet sugar as a saponin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%