2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flocculation of Arthrospira maxima for improved harvesting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downstream method entails lower-cost exploitation of high-value microalgae metabolites with high product recovery. The composition and productivity of microalgae mainly depends on cultivation mode, nutrient composition, and harvesting time [ 208 ]. The most commonly used harvesting techniques for performance, operating economy, and technological feasibility are membrane filtration, centrifugation, microfiltration, ultrafiltration, gravity sedimentation, electrolytic phase, electrophoresis, and magnetic separation [ 209 ].…”
Section: Harvesting and Downstream Process Of Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downstream method entails lower-cost exploitation of high-value microalgae metabolites with high product recovery. The composition and productivity of microalgae mainly depends on cultivation mode, nutrient composition, and harvesting time [ 208 ]. The most commonly used harvesting techniques for performance, operating economy, and technological feasibility are membrane filtration, centrifugation, microfiltration, ultrafiltration, gravity sedimentation, electrolytic phase, electrophoresis, and magnetic separation [ 209 ].…”
Section: Harvesting and Downstream Process Of Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Vandamme et al, 2012). In a recent study, the effect of pH variations and addition of flocculant such as calcium chloride on the harvesting of microalgae Arthrospira maxima was studied and observed that pH > 10 and CaCl 2 0.2-2.0 gL −1 at a 1:30 ratio (v/v) of CaCl 2 /microalgae culture could be applied to harvest biomass efficiently (Caetano et al, 2020).…”
Section: Chemical Flocculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no single most suitable harvesting method for each microalgae genera; in general, the ideal is to use a method that preserves the biomass composition and does not hinder the recovery of the product of interest. The most common harvesting methods include filtration (Monte et al, 2018), centrifugation, flotation, flocculation (Caetano et al, 2020b), electroflocculation (Zenouzi et al, 2013), gravity sedimentation, electrolytic process, electrophoresis and magnetic separation (Safi et al, 2014). However, combining harvesting methods with a previous step of chemical or biological coagulation/ flocculation thickening can increase process efficiency and reduce the operating costs (Grima et al, 2003).…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flocculation can be used as a previous step to biomass recovery, as it consists of microalgae agglomeration, facilitating and increasing the efficiency of the subsequent processes (Caetano et al, 2020b). The repulsion charge between microalgae is neutralized or reduced by using flocculants such as aluminum sulfate salts (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 ), iron chloride (FeCl 3 ) and iron sulfate (Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 ), among others (Mata et al, 2016).…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%