“…An important shortcoming of the aforementioned complex modelling approaches is the high amount of input data needed for setting up, calibration, and verification of the models, and the high computational cost associated with the simulation of different probable scenarios. The historical and hydro‐geomorphological approach (Spaliviero, ) appears as a simple but efficient framework for a better long‐term territorial planning (e.g., Forte, Pennetta, & Strobl, ; Nirupama & Simonovic, ; Spaliviero, De Dapper, & Maló, ). In this context, fluvial geomorphology provides a framework for flood‐risk assessment, especially through (a) delineation of flood prone areas in broad alluvial valleys by mapping flood‐related landforms and deposits, soil and plant associations, and flood observations (Benito & Hudson, ; Bodoque et al, ) and (b) paleohydrology reconstructions of the evolution of rivers (Isla et al, ) and lakes (Guerra, Piovano, Córdoba, Sylvestre, & Damatto, ).…”