2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11010098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood Hazard Mapping and Assessment on the Angkor World Heritage Site, Cambodia

Abstract: World Heritage sites in general are exposed to the impacts of natural hazards, which threaten their integrity and may compromise their value. Floods are a severe threat to the Angkor World Heritage site. Studies of regional floods and flood hazard zoning have played an increasingly important role in ensuring sustainability of the Angkor site. This study developed a flood hazard index (FHI) model based on a geographic information system (GIS) and used synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data to extract historical fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have used support vector machine models [28], ANN model [29], ANFIS [30], a combination of fuzzy logic and support vector machine [31], integrated machine learning and statistical models [32], DT algorithm [33], logistic regression [34], and an ensemble of regression trees and support vector machine [35]. Despite the recent focus on quantitative methods of flood vulnerability analysis, qualitative approaches such as the AHP and ANP are still being adopted [36,37] due to their relative simplicity in computing flood influencing parameters. The weights of each of the parameter considered in an AHP model are determined by expert opinions unlike the quantitative methods that require rigorous training and computations [28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have used support vector machine models [28], ANN model [29], ANFIS [30], a combination of fuzzy logic and support vector machine [31], integrated machine learning and statistical models [32], DT algorithm [33], logistic regression [34], and an ensemble of regression trees and support vector machine [35]. Despite the recent focus on quantitative methods of flood vulnerability analysis, qualitative approaches such as the AHP and ANP are still being adopted [36,37] due to their relative simplicity in computing flood influencing parameters. The weights of each of the parameter considered in an AHP model are determined by expert opinions unlike the quantitative methods that require rigorous training and computations [28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deciding where to construct infrastructure is a complicated process that requires managers to evaluate a multitude of technical criteria, such as hydrologic geospatial data. To avoid reliability issues, infrastructure managers need to incorporate multiple experts (e.g., civil engineers, hydrologists, urban planners) to truly develop a more accurate decision-model However, in countries with limited technical capacity, there has been limited work evaluating methods to synthesize this knowledge [4,58,59]. We theorized that the AHP theory could fill this knowledge gap to improve decision-making processes involving multiple technical criteria and expert opinions.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flood hazard mapping obtained by using SAR images from different years and flood hazard index (FHI) was developed to analyze the flood in the Angkor area. The area around Angkor Wat monuments must be monitored, and flood control measures should be taken into account to protect the site from flooding (Liu et al, 2019). MODIS and DEM were used to investigate the seasonal change of inundation areas and water volume and floodplain of Tonle Sap (Siev et al, 2016).…”
Section: Rs Application On Flood Analysis Over Cambodiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S-Band Doppler weather radar meteor 650C, which has a range of 450 km located in Phnom Penh was not used in any flood analysis over Cambodia. (Hazarika et al, 2007;Kim et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2019;Ly et al, 2018;Son et al, 2019;Try et al, 2019) Flood (Kim et al, 2019;Mohammed et al, 2018;Sakamoto et al, 2007;Siev et al, 2016;Tangdamrongsub et al, 2016;Vichet et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2019) Flood damage assessment DEM * Landsat-8 * UNOSAT * RRI (Chung et al, 2019) * is number of studies have been used…”
Section: Gaps Of Flood Analysis Under Rs Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%