Flood Hazard Mapping Combining Hydrodynamic Modeling and Multi Annual Remote Sensing data

Abstract

This paper explores a method to combine the time and space continuity of a large-scale inundation model with discontinuous satellite microwave observations, for high-resolution flood hazard mapping. The assumption behind this approach is that hydraulic variables computed from continuous spatially-distributed hydrodynamic modeling and observed as discrete satellite-derived flood extents are correlated in time, so that probabilities can be transferred from the model series to the observations. A prerequisite is, therefore, the existence of a significant correlation between a modeled variable (i.e., flood extent or volume) and the synchronously-observed flood extent. If this is the case, the availability of model simulations over a long time period allows for a robust estimate of non-exceedance probabilities that can be attributed to corresponding synchronously-available satellite observations. The generated flood hazard map has a spatial resolution equal to that of the satellite images, which is higher than that of currently available large scale inundation models. The method was applied on the Severn River (UK), using the outputs of a global inundation model provided by the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts OPEN ACCESSRemote Sens. 2015, 7 14201and a large collection of ENVISAT ASAR imagery. A comparison between the hazard map obtained with the proposed method and with a more traditional numerical modeling approach supports the hypothesis that combining model results and satellite observations could provide advantages for high-resolution flood hazard mapping, provided that a sufficient number of remote sensing images is available and that a time correlation is present between variables derived from a global model and obtained from satellite observations.

Flood Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment for Different Land Use Classes Using a Flow Model

“…Very recently, Bangladesh government has focused on both structural and nonstructural flood management approaches to reduce vulnerability to flooding in the country (Paul 1995(Paul , 1997Paul and Hossain 2013). Preparation of flood risk maps is the basic requirement before non-structural flood hazard mitigation approaches Demir and Kisi 2016;Giustarini et al 2015;Hoque et al 2011;Islam et al 2010;Islam and Sado 2000). Flood risk mapping facilitates the administrators and planners to identify areas vulnerable to flood hazard and to determine infrastructure at risk and the degree they might be affected, and to map their capacity to respond and recover Hazarika et al 2018;Sanyal and Lu 2009;Tran et al 2009;Vojtek and Vojteková 2016).…”

Exploiting the proliferation of current and future satellite observations of rivers

“…More recently, however, probabilistic approaches have been employed to process a flood image (e.g. Schumann et al, 2009a;Westerhoff et al, 2013;Giustarini et al, 2015), which can increase information content considerably, thereby achieving better model calibration (Di Baldassarre et al, 2009).…”

Unlocking the full potential of Earth observation during the 2015 Texas flood disaster

“…[], and Giustarini et al . []). This major challenge was clearly posed by the Texas event and was, in part, the assembly of data from a variety of sources, and to embed any local higher‐resolution flood images within the larger and time‐extended regional context of an expanding regional flood event.…”