2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/4795853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood Prediction in Ungauged Basins by Physical-Based TOPKAPI Model

Abstract: Scarce historical flood data in ungauged basins make it difficult to establish empirical and conceptual model forecast in these areas. The physical-based distributed model TOPKAPI is introduced for flood prediction in an ungauged basin by parameter transplant. Five main parameters are selected, and the sensitivity is analyzed by the GLUE method. The Xixian basin and Huangchuan basin in the upper Huaihe basin in China are chosen as study areas. The Xixian basin is regarded as a gauged basin for parameter calibr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of peak error and peak time error also increase considerably after 7 days lead time. Although the results confirm that the satellite-based ECMWF precipitation can be appropriately employed to run MIKE 11 NAM-HD model for flood prediction purpose in Jhelum basin, complete accomplishment of the potential of smooth satellite-based precipitation estimates calls for better analysis of optimal calibration procedure for incorporating remote sensing data into a real-time hydrological modelling system for vast ungauged or scarcely gauged basins of the world(Kong et al 2019;Jiang and Wang 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The values of peak error and peak time error also increase considerably after 7 days lead time. Although the results confirm that the satellite-based ECMWF precipitation can be appropriately employed to run MIKE 11 NAM-HD model for flood prediction purpose in Jhelum basin, complete accomplishment of the potential of smooth satellite-based precipitation estimates calls for better analysis of optimal calibration procedure for incorporating remote sensing data into a real-time hydrological modelling system for vast ungauged or scarcely gauged basins of the world(Kong et al 2019;Jiang and Wang 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Specifically, most hydrological models consider the variables associated with real rivers as the influential variables, and the parameters of the hydrological model are estimated using empirical formulas or strategic values. To estimate the values of the actual discharge and water level, the water‐level or flow data must be acquired to adjust the model parameters (Kong et al, 2019; Kushwaha & Jain, 2013). In this study, the actual discharge and water level were used as the objective function for the model optimization, and the roughness coefficient of the channel, roughness coefficient of the conduit, impermeable area ratio, curve number (CN), and loss coefficient were considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GLUE method includes several steps: (1) select a hydrological model and determine the model parameter space; (2) select a likelihood function and determine the threshold value and the priori probability distribution; (3) randomly extract parameter sets from the parameter space; (4) run the model with the extracted parameter sets, calculate the likelihood value according to the model results and save the behavioral parameter sets if the likelihood value exceeds the threshold; (5) rescale the threshold values to formulate a cumulative distribution. In this study, the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) [53] was selected as the likelihood function, as in many other studies [23,28,29,52]:…”
Section: The Glue Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the parameter uncertainty, different methods have been used, for example, the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) [19], Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) [20], Parameter Solution (ParaSol) [21], Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) [22], etc. Among them, the GLUE attracts many users due to its simpler concept and convenience in implementation [13,23,24]. As a typical Monte Carlo method, the GLUE method requires sampling from the model parameter space and performing a run of the model with each set of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%