2013
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood risk assessment for infrastructure networks

Abstract: A practical framework for flood risk screening was developed to assess the flood risk to water utility assets within the infrastructure network. The tool is a combination of probability and consequence assessments. The first takes into account how probable it is for a particular asset to flood and cause significant damage. The second estimates the level of consequences a flood will have, considering, for example, the level of loss of service, environmental pollution and cost. The consequence assessment is base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ivanov et al, 2004;Martina and Entekhabi, 2006;Noto et al, 2008) with specific regard to the application of the width function (WF) geomorphic approach Rodriguez-Iturbe et al, 1994;Rodríguez-Iturbe and Rinaldo, 1997) also considering varying geomorphoclimatic (Graf, 1977;Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979;Rodriguez-Iturbe et al, 1982;Naden, 1992;Di Lazzaro and Volpi, 2011;Volpi et al, 2013) and urban settings (Veitzer and Gupta, 2001;Smith et al, 2002;Ogden et al, 2011) for providing flood risk managers and decision makers an accurate informative framework to develop safe river basin and urban area development and management plans (e.g. Cunha et al, 2011;Faulkner et al, 2012;Pedersen et al, 2012;Ciervo et al, 2014;Emanuelsson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ivanov et al, 2004;Martina and Entekhabi, 2006;Noto et al, 2008) with specific regard to the application of the width function (WF) geomorphic approach Rodriguez-Iturbe et al, 1994;Rodríguez-Iturbe and Rinaldo, 1997) also considering varying geomorphoclimatic (Graf, 1977;Rodriguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979;Rodriguez-Iturbe et al, 1982;Naden, 1992;Di Lazzaro and Volpi, 2011;Volpi et al, 2013) and urban settings (Veitzer and Gupta, 2001;Smith et al, 2002;Ogden et al, 2011) for providing flood risk managers and decision makers an accurate informative framework to develop safe river basin and urban area development and management plans (e.g. Cunha et al, 2011;Faulkner et al, 2012;Pedersen et al, 2012;Ciervo et al, 2014;Emanuelsson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex frameworks, such as the one presented by Emanuelsson et al . (), introduces losses not only to the urban fabric but also to services and the environment. More complex models, where the urban fabric is decomposed into several utilities, have been used by Gain and Hoque ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity of decision-making is increased given the large number of alternatives for scale and placement within an urban catchment (Birgani, Yazdandoost, and Moghadam 2013). In addition, the computational expense of 2D above-ground flood modelling limits the number of options that can be analysed prior to detailed design (Emanuelsson et al 2014). This leads to a limited evidence base for decision-makers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%