Flood risk behaviors of United States riverine metropolitan areas are driven by local hydrology and shaped by race

Abstract

Flooding risk results from complex interactions between hydrological hazards (e.g., riverine inundation during periods of heavy rainfall), exposure, vulnerability (e.g., the potential for structural damage or loss of life), and resilience (how well we recover, learn from, and adapt to past floods). Building on recent coupled conceptualizations of these complex interactions, we characterize human–flood interactions (collective memory and risk-enduring attitude) at a more comprehensive scale than has been attempted to date across 50 US metropolitan statistical areas with a sociohydrologic (SH) model calibrated with accessible local data (historical records of annual peak streamflow, flood insurance loss claims, active insurance policy records, and population density). A cluster analysis on calibrated SH model parameter sets for metropolitan areas identified two dominant behaviors: 1) “risk-enduring” cities with lower flooding defenses and longer memory of past flood loss events and 2) “risk-averse” cities with higher flooding defenses and reduced memory of past flooding. These divergent behaviors correlated with differences in local stream flashiness indices (i.e., the frequency and rapidity of daily changes in streamflow), maximum dam heights, and the proportion of White to non-White residents in US metropolitan areas. Risk-averse cities tended to exist within regions characterized by flashier streamflow conditions, larger dams, and larger proportions of White residents. Our research supports the development of SH models in urban metropolitan areas and the design of risk management strategies that consider both demographically heterogeneous populations, changing flood defenses, and temporal changes in community risk perceptions and tolerance.

Exploring the association between precipitation and population cases of ocular toxoplasmosis in Colombia

“…In Chocó, when the rainy season begins, the RR may decrease because the population does not go out to collect water or work in the rivers. Previous studies have shown that behaviors tend to vary significantly in populations with a higher risk of floods and rising rivers [ 40 , 41 ]. However, over time the risk tends to increase in Chocó.…”

Understanding the Linkages between Climate Change and Inequality in the United States

“…A study by Knighton et al (2021) 5 examines differences in flood-risk mitigating behavior by race. Using data on flood insurance loss claims and active insurance policy records from fifty U.S. metropolitan areas, they identify two types of communities: "risk-enduring" with lower flood defenses and "risk-averse" with higher defenses.…”

Hazards are the key drivers of uncertainties surrounding riverine flood risks

“…Flood risk results from complex interactions among hazard, exposure, and vulnerability 6,7 . Hazard refers to the nature, magnitude, and probability of a flood event.…”