Rice cultivation practices in the United States typically include managing irrigation water for inundated conditions. In the Arkansas Delta region, for example, rice fields can require 5-20 cm of inundation for seeding, with intermittent or continuous flooding during growth phases until drainage near harvest, and between rotations for wildfowl habitat or land maintenance (Reba et al., 2020). Irrigation practices, access to water, regulatory policies, and infrastructure vary across the Midsouth USA resulting in many unique combinations of landforms, irrigation regimes, and water sources. When using flood irrigation, producers have challenges managing and measuring water quantities at the field or paddy level. One well or well outlet can irrigate multiple fields, water is gravity-driven from field to field, underground pipe and plumbing infrastructure can use a combination of ground and surface water, and surface poly-pipe can move water from field to field. In Arkansas, total water use throughout the growing season can range from 382 mm on zero grade (fields without of slope) to 1,034 mm for contour levees (Smith et al., 2007). Regardless of the approach to irrigation, the ground water supply is depleting faster than recharge (Kresse et al., 2014), and public private partnerships are investigating tradeoffs across irrigation regimes, greenhouse gas emissions, water quantity, and management practices (Nalley et al., 2015; Reba et al., 2013; Reba & Massey, 2020). To scale these field experiments the science community and public and private sectors can benefit from synoptic, large area metrics on rice field inundation conditions. Traditionally, optical satellite remote sensing tools have focused on identifying surface or open water conditions. These sensors and techniques struggle when postharvest residues are present or once crop emergence