2019
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w7-73-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flooded Area Extraction of Rice Paddy Field in Indonesia Using Sentinel-1 Sar Data

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The objective of this study is to detect flooded area in rice paddy fields in Indonesia by using remotely sensed data. We used synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data for this purpose, because it is capable of getting high-resolution data in almost all-weather conditions. The paper gives a result of detecting flooded area occurred in our research sites located close to Bandung area, Tegalluar in Bojongsoang district, from the end of February to the beginning of March… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A threshold for the backscattering coefficient to divide flood and non-flood areas was successfully applied to SAR data over various frequencies (Henry et al, 2006, Martinis et al, 2015, and Ohki et al, 2016. We selected fifty rice objects and fifty non-rice objects which are evenly distributed over the study area, calculated their minimum VH backscatter intensity during the time window, and applied linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to separate rice and non-rice objects using gamma-naught, which ultimately provides a threshold that separates the two classes [37]. A separation line between two classes can be established and the threshold can be obtained from the LDA with a threshold of −20.1 dB.…”
Section: Flood Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A threshold for the backscattering coefficient to divide flood and non-flood areas was successfully applied to SAR data over various frequencies (Henry et al, 2006, Martinis et al, 2015, and Ohki et al, 2016. We selected fifty rice objects and fifty non-rice objects which are evenly distributed over the study area, calculated their minimum VH backscatter intensity during the time window, and applied linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to separate rice and non-rice objects using gamma-naught, which ultimately provides a threshold that separates the two classes [37]. A separation line between two classes can be established and the threshold can be obtained from the LDA with a threshold of −20.1 dB.…”
Section: Flood Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the optical MODIS-based LSWI/EVI relationship approach, we also applied the minimum value of VH data in the transplanting stage to identify flooding signals, as suggested in previous studies (Clauss et al, 2018b). VH has a higher sensitivity in paddy rice growth stages than VV polarization (Inoue et al, 2020;Nguyen et al, 2016;Wakabayashi et al, 2019). However, the minimum value of VH in different regions is different because Sentinel-1 data are affected by the incidence angle (ranging from approximately 30° to 45°) (Figure S5) (Phung et al, 2020;Singha et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Algorithm For Identifying Paddy Rice Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wakabayashi et al. (2019) assessed Sentinel‐1 backscatter expressed in gamma naught to reduce the impact of incidence angle. This research used a thresholding technique to detect flooded rice fields in Indonesia with very high accuracies of 98% reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Stroppiana et al (2019) applied a region-growing algorithm to detect flooded rice fields using VV Sentinel-1 sigma-naught backscatter, achieving an accuracy greater than 70% using optical data as the comparison. Wakabayashi et al (2019) assessed Sentinel-1 backscatter expressed in gamma naught to reduce the impact of incidence angle. This research used a thresholding technique to detect flooded rice fields in Indonesia with very high accuracies of 98% reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%