2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2017.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FLOPSYNC-QACS: Quantization-aware clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks

Abstract: Distributed real-time systems often rely on clock synchronization. However, the achievement of precise synchronization in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is hampered by competing design challenges, which finally causes many WSN hardware platforms to rely on low frequency clock crystal for local timebase provision. Although this solution is inexpensive and with a remarkably low energy consumption, it limits the resolution at which time can be measured. The FLOPSYNC synchronization scheme was then introduced to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has certain advantages compared to the batch least square based clock synchronization. Another control theoretical solution based on low-frequency oscillators is FLOPSYNC-QACS by Terraneo et al [ 74 ]. The authors present a control scheme that can be used when the quantization errors dominate the other time errors.…”
Section: Clock Discipline Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has certain advantages compared to the batch least square based clock synchronization. Another control theoretical solution based on low-frequency oscillators is FLOPSYNC-QACS by Terraneo et al [ 74 ]. The authors present a control scheme that can be used when the quantization errors dominate the other time errors.…”
Section: Clock Discipline Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in this category solutions have been proposed to synchronize within one clock tick, like FLOPSYNC-QACS [7], the low resolution of the timebase inevitably results in a synchronization lower bound, that with the typically used 32 kHz crystals is of approximately 30.5µs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We carry out the design in the continuous time domain, mainly because doing so allows to operate with frequency values directly, and independently of the adopted synchronization period. Putting model (7) in transfer function form and transforming to continuous time, we get E hl (s) = P(s) (U hl (s) + D hl (s)) , P(s)…”
Section: B Skew Correction In the Jitter-compensated Vhtmentioning
confidence: 99%