Historical Floras are biodiversity-oriented textual sources, which refer to times when scientific methods were far different compared to the present. They are also geographical documents, as the entire work is referred to a focal region explored by certain collectors and following certain principles, since the taxa recorded are usually accompanied by a description of the locality of the observation. Retrospective georeferencing, as well as taxonomic revision, of the records in historical Floras are however very challenging processes, which are usually not taken into account. As a result, very few global overviews of historical Floras exist to date. In this article we present the analysis of the 7767 floristic records of the late XIX century Flora of the province of Bologna (N-Italy) compiled by Girolamo Cocconi. We processed these records by georeferencing them, whenever possible, to 659 pairs of coordinates and coupling them with the analysis of the collectors involved besides the author, as to provide the spatial and temporal dimension that permits us to further understand the taxonomic information given by the species listed. This allowed us to detect a bias in the exploration of the territory, which depended on accessibility and/or attractivity of the areas for fieldwork and shifted through time as function of the available collaborators who influenced the definition of the floristic pattern of the territory. Finally, we provided a diachronic analysis with the present flora in order to document the most significant land use changes based on selected floristic target groups.
INTRODUCTIONWritten sources such as books may represent an important source of information when analysing landscape history and transformation (e.g. Fuchs et al. 2015). This is the case in various European countries, where written sources like exploration travel reports, chorographic atlases or Floras cover a time interval of centuries and prove a true cultural heritage for the area of reference (e.g. Rohl 2011). In this context ancient Floras 1 represent an iconic case of highly valuable cultural and scientific heritage, especially the oldest ones. In Europe, the very first modern Flora is probably the Synopsis Methodica Stirpium Britannicarum by John Ray (Online resource 1), which first appeared towards the end of the XVII century (Stace 1989), even if the first place is usually given to Linnaeus' Flora Lapponica, published in 1737 (Frodin 2002). But actually, an earlier anticipation was provided by Ray himself with his Catalogus plantarum circa Cantabrigiam nascentium (1660), that is, to our knowledge, the first European urbanmunicipality-countee Flora. Some decades later (e.g. Séguier 1745; Scopoli 1760; Vitman 1773; Buillard 1776; Lamarck 1778), especially during the XIX century, several local or national Floras were published (e.g. Bertoloni 1833-1854; Rostrup 1860; Wilkomm and Lange 1861-1880). Regarding the Italian situation in particular, at least 33 local Floras were published during the boom of floristic exploration from 1849 to...