2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2004.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow characteristics in hydraulically equilibrium two-phase flows in a vertical 2×3 rod bundle channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data trend agrees with the calculations by Carlucci et al's correlations (8) . However, the agreement is not quantitatively enough as reported by Sadatomi et al (5) Figure 5 shows total pressure drop data in each subchannel. The pressure drop is almost identical between Ch.1 and Ch.2 because the flow under consideration is a hydraulically equilibrium flow in which both the pressure difference and the net fluid transfer do not exist between the subchannels as a time averaged value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This data trend agrees with the calculations by Carlucci et al's correlations (8) . However, the agreement is not quantitatively enough as reported by Sadatomi et al (5) Figure 5 shows total pressure drop data in each subchannel. The pressure drop is almost identical between Ch.1 and Ch.2 because the flow under consideration is a hydraulically equilibrium flow in which both the pressure difference and the net fluid transfer do not exist between the subchannels as a time averaged value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…1 Cross-section of the test channel with 2 × 3 rods of the entry section. The flow rates of water and air in each group were so controlled for the flow in the mixing section to become hydraulically equilibrium flow, as described in Sadatomi et al (5) In the mixing section, both phases could go through all the gaps between the subchannels. In the other three sections, however, they could not because of the insertion of 1.0 mm thick fins into the grooves on the duct and the rods walls, as shown in the left hand side of the figure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pressure drop was measured with a differential-type pressure transducer within ± 2% by taking an appropriate interval between two pressure taps. Gas bubble velocity in bubbly and slug flows was measured within ± 2% with two pairs of ring electrodes in a constant current method developed by Fukano (8) and modified a little by Sadatomi et al (9) . The interval between the electrodes in each pair was 8 mm and that between two pairs was 75 mm, independent of the pipe diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%