2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.39435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Control over a Conical Forebody Using Duty-Cycled Plasma Actuators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the flow control in the burst operation mode of the plasma actuator has received much attention for its effectiveness [7][8][9][10] . This burst mode periodically generates a large vortex whose size is larger than the boundary layer.…”
Section: Control In Burst Operation Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, the flow control in the burst operation mode of the plasma actuator has received much attention for its effectiveness [7][8][9][10] . This burst mode periodically generates a large vortex whose size is larger than the boundary layer.…”
Section: Control In Burst Operation Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other advantages are that this is an electronic device without any moving parts, has fast response, and is thin and light in weight. There exist some studies where a plasma actuator acts as a control device for the asymmetric vortices over a slender body 9,10) . The plasma actuator was installed on the nose tip of the slender body and only a bang-bang control of the side force was accomplished (In general, it is known that a control effect at the nose tip is too sensitive for the asymmetric vortex structure to proportionally control the side force 2) ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found experimentally that unsteady dynamic control techniques are needed to achieve this goal. [1][2][3] Recently, Liu et al 4 reported wind-tunnel experiments that demonstrate nearly linear proportional control of lateral forces and moments over a slender conical forebody at high angles of attack by employing a novel design and placement of a pair of single dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) plasma actuators near the cone apex combined with a duty cycle technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the sign changes of side force are caused by the occurrences of additional vortex separated alternately from the port and starboard side of the body to the initial vortex pair originated from the body apex. [5][6][7] How the plasma actuations affect the asymmetric forces and vortex flow on the circular-cone forebody 4 at high angles of attack upto 70…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of vortex flows over slender bodies to nose-tip imperfections has been exploited for vortex control. [8][9][10] The asymmetric vortex system over slender bodies will become unsteady at sufficiently high AOAs (typically more than 65 • ). It can been anticipated that the flow pattern over after-bodies downstream will transition to Kármán vortex shedding if the cylindrical after-body is sufficiently long.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%