2019
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow dynamic in a packed bed filled with Ni‐Al2O3 porous catalyst: Experimental and numerical approach

Abstract: Numerical simulations and experiments have been carried out to explore the effect of particle shapes on the pressure drop and the loss factor in a packed fixed bed filled with a porous catalyst. The packed bed is presented by the Ni‐Al2O3 catalyst of the different shapes. The commercial program ANSYS Fluent is used for the analysis; more than 20 mln cells are used for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. The catalyst particles were set as a porous medium with the viscous resistance coefficients and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure drop in packed bed reactors becomes significant at high flow rates, low bed porosity or small catalyst particles, and large bed heights. [43][44][45] However, in the present work, catalyst particles in the range of 250 to 400 m were used, and the catalyst bed was not high enough to cause any significant pressure drop. A relatively low flow rate of inlet gas was used, and with the reactor, inner diameter of 6 mm, the linear velocity was 0.015 m/s.…”
Section: Catalyst Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The pressure drop in packed bed reactors becomes significant at high flow rates, low bed porosity or small catalyst particles, and large bed heights. [43][44][45] However, in the present work, catalyst particles in the range of 250 to 400 m were used, and the catalyst bed was not high enough to cause any significant pressure drop. A relatively low flow rate of inlet gas was used, and with the reactor, inner diameter of 6 mm, the linear velocity was 0.015 m/s.…”
Section: Catalyst Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This indicated that the methanol solution flow rate in testing range (0.5‐3.5 g/min) has little effect on hydrogen production performance of MFPS, and the MFPS can be operated at methanol flow rate of 0.8 to 3.0 g/min. With the increasing of methanol solution flow rate, the pressure drops of the reactor increased 36,37 . According to the chemical equilibrium, we known that increasing the reactor pressure will impede the MSR reaction, which leads to the decrease of MSR conversion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the size of the used powders, a slight increase in the reactor pressure is detected (0.05 atm). However, considering the use of the particles in the form of powder and comparing the pressure drop relieved with the typical values available in the literature for fixed bed reactor, 36 the pressure drops are considered negligible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%