1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(80)90650-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow field and acoustic properties of a Mach number 0·9 jet at a low Reynolds number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
30
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to measurements provided by Mollo-Christensen et al, 32 Lush, 77 and Bogey et al 78 for Mach number 0.9 jets at Reynolds numbers higher than Re D = 5 × 10 5 , they are found to be higher for all radiation angles. They however decrease with Re D , which is not surprising given the lowering of peak turbulence intensities in Figure 11, reducing the gap with 31,42,46 at Re D ≤ 10 4 and mixing layers 47 at Re θ ≤ 500, noise reduction arose in a few experiments on circular jets at moderate Reynolds numbers as in this study. This trend was, for instance, identified by Viswanathan 36 for hot jets at Re D ≤ 4 × 10 5 .…”
Section: Acoustic Fieldssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to measurements provided by Mollo-Christensen et al, 32 Lush, 77 and Bogey et al 78 for Mach number 0.9 jets at Reynolds numbers higher than Re D = 5 × 10 5 , they are found to be higher for all radiation angles. They however decrease with Re D , which is not surprising given the lowering of peak turbulence intensities in Figure 11, reducing the gap with 31,42,46 at Re D ≤ 10 4 and mixing layers 47 at Re θ ≤ 500, noise reduction arose in a few experiments on circular jets at moderate Reynolds numbers as in this study. This trend was, for instance, identified by Viswanathan 36 for hot jets at Re D ≤ 4 × 10 5 .…”
Section: Acoustic Fieldssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For subsonic jets, some similarities remain between the sound fields of low and high Reynolds number jets as shown by the data of Stromberg et al 31 for a Mach number 0.9 jet at Re D = 3.6 × 10 3 . It is however well known that the spectral properties of subsonic jet noise vary with the Reynolds number below a threshold value between Re D = 10 5 and Re D = 4 × 10 5 according to authors such as Yamamoto and Arndt, 33 Long and Arndt, 34 Bridges and Hussain, 35 and Viswanathan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…13. In follow-on work UCLA undertook the study of a M=0.9 jet whose experimental conditions match the experiments of Stromberg et al (1980). These computations follow similar but considerably simpler methods using the Euler equations that have been ongoing at NASA Glenn Research Center for some time: e.g., Hixon et al (1997).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, numerical simulation of the jet flows process at large Reynolds numbers and the determination of acoustic disturbances generated by them presents considerable computational difficulties. In turn, the flow parameters of the jets with low Reynolds numbers are well studied [1][2][3] and can be used to validate the numerical method and schemes, since there is no need to use a very detailed grid and additional assumptions, related with different turbulence models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine acoustic disturbances, we use the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings analogy, which is implemented in the libAcoustic library based on the OpenFOAM package [9,10]. The flow parameters and geometry match an experimental study conducted by Stromberg et al [1] and results are compared to their data whenever possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%