2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-4312-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow field-flow fractionation: recent trends in protein analysis

Abstract: Flow field-flow fractionation (F4) is the gentlest flow-assisted separation technique for analysis of macromolecules. The use of an empty channel as separation device and of a second mobile phase flow as perpendicular field enable F4 to separate analytes under native conditions without any modification of their original structure. Because of this unique peculiarity, F4 has been shown to be ideal for "gentle" separation of biological samples, for example intact proteins and protein complexes, since its early de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sealing a connecting T equipped with appropriate flow restrictors at that position controlled the radial flow rate. Obviously, and in contrast to a HF5 glass holder or asymmetrical flow FFF (AFFFF), it was not possible to visualize the possible focusing position [13,15,16]. However, some blind focalization processes appeared effective as previously demonstrated [21] and have been systematically applied in this report.…”
Section: Hf5 Dry Columnscontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sealing a connecting T equipped with appropriate flow restrictors at that position controlled the radial flow rate. Obviously, and in contrast to a HF5 glass holder or asymmetrical flow FFF (AFFFF), it was not possible to visualize the possible focusing position [13,15,16]. However, some blind focalization processes appeared effective as previously demonstrated [21] and have been systematically applied in this report.…”
Section: Hf5 Dry Columnscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Nevertheless, the absence of commercial interest, the lack of a large scientific application market associated with a high level of interfacing competences linking cell biology, instrumentation, chemistry, and material sciences limit the wide spread use of cell sorting by SdFFF. However, the success of all FFF techniques using flow as an external field has positioned the FFF concept in some key positions [13] for environmental studies [14] or biotechnologies [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Expansion of FFF cell sorting methodologies by means of an adapted and simplified instrumentation, which could be easily used by unspecialized laboratories, opens a new trend.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In native MS, where physiological or near-physiological conditions are required, the task of separating non-denatured proteins and protein complexes at high resolution is further complicated. Conventional separation techniques compatible with native MS include size exclusion chromatography (SEC) [18], ion exchange chromatography (IEX) [19], hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) [20], affinity chromatography [21], capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) [22, 23], native gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis (GELFrEE) [24, 25], native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [26], capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) [27, 28] and flow field-flow fractionation (F4) [29, 30]. However, for many of these methods, online interfacing to a mass spectrometer is challenging or yet impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In native MS, where physiological or near-physiological conditions are required, the task of separating non-denatured proteins and protein complexes at high resolution is further complicated. Conventional separation techniques compatible with native MS include size exclusion chromatography (SEC) [302], ion exchange chromatography (IEX) [163], hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) [303], affinity chromatography [304], capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) [305,306], native gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis (GELFrEE) [167,307], native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [308], capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) [67,309] and flow field-flow fractionation (F4) [310,311]. However, for many of these methods, online interfacing to a mass spectrometer is challenging or yet impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%