2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-mode water treatment under simultaneous hydrodynamic cavitation and plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In actual numbers, 6 L of cyanobacteria contaminated water (5 × 10 5 cells/mL) was disinfected in less than 15 s. This volume efficiency is a remarkable improvement over the known methods of underwater discharge generation (Table 1), even when we compare the HCPJ with a few known works where authors also employed cavitation clouds to sustain the underwater discharge [29,32,33]. Very recently, a plasma-cavitation device for water treatment of throughput similar to ours was presented in [30], but unfortunately no details were given in the article with respect to discharge ignition or energy consumption, so we can not make a qualified comparison to our previous results in [28]. In both of these plasma-cavitation device experiments [28,30], the high volumetric efficiency (of almost 1 m 3 /h) was obtained for direct plasma remediation of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In actual numbers, 6 L of cyanobacteria contaminated water (5 × 10 5 cells/mL) was disinfected in less than 15 s. This volume efficiency is a remarkable improvement over the known methods of underwater discharge generation (Table 1), even when we compare the HCPJ with a few known works where authors also employed cavitation clouds to sustain the underwater discharge [29,32,33]. Very recently, a plasma-cavitation device for water treatment of throughput similar to ours was presented in [30], but unfortunately no details were given in the article with respect to discharge ignition or energy consumption, so we can not make a qualified comparison to our previous results in [28]. In both of these plasma-cavitation device experiments [28,30], the high volumetric efficiency (of almost 1 m 3 /h) was obtained for direct plasma remediation of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Very recently, a plasma-cavitation device for water treatment of throughput similar to ours was presented in [30], but unfortunately no details were given in the article with respect to discharge ignition or energy consumption, so we can not make a qualified comparison to our previous results in [28]. In both of these plasma-cavitation device experiments [28,30], the high volumetric efficiency (of almost 1 m 3 /h) was obtained for direct plasma remediation of water. However, according to our best knowledge, so far, there are no reports on using such devices for the production of PAW as an active medium itself, allowing flow rates close to 1 m 3 /h to produce PAW with proven remote, ex-plasma biocidal activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, discharge plasma in a gas-liquid water environment is considered one of the most promising technologies that can be applied in various fields, i.e., water pollutant removal, biological inactivation, polymer surface modification, chemical synthesis, and nanoparticle synthesis [6][7][8][9][10]. In addition to the chemical effects, the discharge plasma in the gas-liquid water environment also results in physical effects, i.e., ultraviolet radiation and shockwave Plasma 2021, 4 310 generation [6,7,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Another advantage regarding the use of discharge plasma in the gas-liquid water environment is that the discharge plasma is usually more easily formed in the gas phase than in the liquid state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the formation of cold plasma in the fluid flow gave encouraging results among methods involving the use of electric current. The inactivation of microorganisms achieved by this method can reach up to 99.99%, even at very high initial concentrations (25 × 10 7 bact./mL, which corresponds to wastes in medical institutions) [10]. However, being a technique not fully investigated and optimized, a real application was not reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%