Flow of Gases and Liquids through Ultrafine Capillaries Having Diameters between 1.5 and 60 Micrometers

Hedley, W.H.; Olt, R.G.; Holboke, Lawrence E.; Wurstner, A. L.

doi:10.1122/1.549474

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rates of penetration of liquids into capillaries with diameters from 290 to 740 pm were made by Washburn (1921) and from 56 to 102 pm by Kissling and Gross (1970), where both showed that the measured flow rates agreed well with the predictions of the Poiseuille Equation (Equation 2-16). Hedley et al (1978) have made measurements on the flow rates of water through various sized circular capillaries with diameters ranging from 1 pm to 50 p. The downstream pressures were from 0,976 to 1.018 am and the upstream pressures ranged from 1.0% to 1.993 atm.…”

Section: Comparison Of Measured and Predicted Liquid Flow Ratesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For all of the data collected, the average value for the ratio of the observed-to-calculated flow rate was 1.08 with a standard deviation of 0.27. See Figure 2-1 for a plot of the ratio of the calculated flow rate to measured flow rate as a function of the leak hole diameter as reported by Hedley et al (1978).…”

Section: Comparison Of Measured and Predicted Liquid Flow Ratesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Containment analysis for Type B packages used to transport various contents

Anderson¹,

Carlson²,

Fischer

1996

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, compkteness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, proctss, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, m o mmendation. or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect thosc of the United States Government or any agency thereof, DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Measured and Predicted Liquid Flow Ratesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Comparison Of Measured and Predicted Liquid Flow Ratesmentioning

confidence: 99%