1979
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450570302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow of slurries of coarse particles at high solids concentrations

Abstract: Using a lock hopper feeding system, gravel and coal shale slurries containing particles of median diameter approximately 4 mm were transported at high concentrations through a pipe of I.D. 7.87 cm at velocities below 3.5 m/s−1. In addition to the usual measurements of velocity, delivered concentration and hydraulic gradient, in‐situ concentrations and particle velocities were determined. With these measurements, a two‐layer model of stratified flow of the type proposed by Wilson was examined and found to give … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the solution, we need closure relationships for the shear stresses, the friction force, the particle-settling velocity (u p ) and the dispersion coefficient of the solids, D. D is estimated through a procedure described in Appendix B. The shear stresses are estimated in a standard manner for two-phase flows 21 as: Another approach is by Martins and Santana, 10 who also use the Fanning friction factor, but use a different expression for turbulent flow, derived from experimental work, 25 The estimation of the interfacial-friction factor, f i , is done by many researchers through the use of the expression proposed by Televantos et al 26 :…”
Section: Two-layer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the solution, we need closure relationships for the shear stresses, the friction force, the particle-settling velocity (u p ) and the dispersion coefficient of the solids, D. D is estimated through a procedure described in Appendix B. The shear stresses are estimated in a standard manner for two-phase flows 21 as: Another approach is by Martins and Santana, 10 who also use the Fanning friction factor, but use a different expression for turbulent flow, derived from experimental work, 25 The estimation of the interfacial-friction factor, f i , is done by many researchers through the use of the expression proposed by Televantos et al 26 :…”
Section: Two-layer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. 20 is the Colebrook formula for Newtonian fluids flowing in rough pipes with the difference that Televantos et al 26 used the factor 2f i , instead of f i , to account for the increase in the friction factor caused by particle collision with the bed and by entrainment and deposition of particles. According to Cheremisinoff and Gupta, 27 the Televantos study states that the magnitude of f i is not of critical importance in the model.…”
Section: Two-layer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The interfacial friction coefficient, f 12 , in Eq. 9 is evaluated using a modified Colebrook formula for rough pipes (Televantos et al 16 ).…”
Section: Conservation Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid-liquid flow models are classified according to the solid phase distribution in the carrier liquid. The basic flow patterns observed in slurries of coarse particles are: stationary bed, moving bed, heterogeneous flow, and pseudo-homogeneous flow, [2], [5] and [6]. It has been the endeavor of researchers around the world to develop accurate models for pressure drop and concentration distribution in slurry pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%