Flow pattern and pressure drop for oil–water flows in and around 180° bends

Abstract

Pressure drop and flow pattern of oil–water flows were investigated in a 19-mm ID clear polyvinyl chloride pipe consisting of U-bend with radius of curvature of 100 mm. The range for oil and water superficial velocities tested was $$0.04 \le U_{{{\text{so}}}} \le 0.950 \;{\text{m/s}}$$ 0.04 ≤ U so ≤ 0.950 m/s and $$0.13 \le U_{{{\text{sw}}}} \le 1.10 \;{\text{m/s}}$$ 0.13 ≤ U sw ≤ 1.10 m/s , respectively. Measurements were carried out under different flow conditions in a test section that consisted of four different parts: upstream of the bend, at the bend and at two redeveloping flow locations after the bend. The result indicated that the bend had limited influence on downstream flow patterns. However, the shear forces imposed by the bend caused some shift flow pattern transition and bubble characteristics in the redeveloping flow section after the bend relative to develop flow before the bend. Generally, pressure gradient at all the test sections increased with both oil fraction and water superficial velocity and there was a sharp change of pressure gradient profile during phase inversion. The transition point where phase inversion occurred was always within the range of $$0.4 \le U_{{{\text{sw}}}} \le 0.54 \;{\text{m/s}}$$ 0.4 ≤ U sw ≤ 0.54 m/s . Pressure losses differed at the various test sections, and the difference was strongly linked to the superficial velocity of the phases and the flow pattern. At high mixture velocity, pressure losses at the redeveloping section after the bend were higher than that at the bend and that for fully developed flows. At low mixture velocity, pressure losses at the bend are higher than in the straight sections. Pressure drop generally decreased with level of flow development downstream of the bend.

Local Resistances of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flows in Vertical L-Shaped and Z-Shaped Pipes

“…It was found that λ increases with increasing Re l , which is consistent with equation (5). Te main reason for this is that the increase in the fow rate increases the frictional shear between the fuid and the bend wall and the shear at the interface between the gas and liquid phases [25]. In addition, the secondary fow velocity at the bend also increases, increasing the local resistance.…”