18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-5888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Physics Inside a Shape-Transitioning Scramjet Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Additional benefits of this inlet are good performance at off-design conditions, making it suitable as a stage in future access-to-space missions. 8 Barth et al 8 present a complete investigation of the flowfield within the REST engine at Mach 12 flight conditions, with an inlet Mach number of 9.3, suggesting that higher mixing efficiency could be obtained by taking advantage of the vortical structures generated by the REST inlet geometry. …”
Section: Iib Rectangular-to-elliptical Shape Transition (Rest) Inletmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Additional benefits of this inlet are good performance at off-design conditions, making it suitable as a stage in future access-to-space missions. 8 Barth et al 8 present a complete investigation of the flowfield within the REST engine at Mach 12 flight conditions, with an inlet Mach number of 9.3, suggesting that higher mixing efficiency could be obtained by taking advantage of the vortical structures generated by the REST inlet geometry. …”
Section: Iib Rectangular-to-elliptical Shape Transition (Rest) Inletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow conditions for the current study have been selected to match a MACH 12 scramjet flight condition on a 50 kPa constant dynamic pressure trajectory, 8 which has previously been used for ground testing at the university of Queensland. After accounting for a 6 • angle of attack forebody compression, the flow conditions into the inlet (Inlet) and in the vicinity of an inlet ramp injector (Inj.reg.)…”
Section: Iiia Flow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain data relevant to real scramjet operation, the flow conditions represent those found in the MACH 12 REST engine 14,15) tested at a 50 kPa constant dynamic pressure trajectory operating condition. 16) Barth et al 16) presented a complete investigation of the flowfield, from which the values of velocity (U), dynamic pressure (q), and total enthalpy (H 0 ) summarized in Table1 have been extracted. The US3D code developed at the University of Minnesota 17) is used as the CFD solver.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a consequence of the slightly different freestream Mach number and unit Reynolds number of the two test conditions. Further discussion of the internal flow field of a rest engine, with particular focus on the inlet, may be found in Barth et al (2012) and Turner (2010).…”
Section: Internal Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding reduction in total inlet drag and net engine drag would be 13 % and 5 %, respectively. Injection of fuel within the isolator of the m12rest engine is currently under investigation (Barth et al, 2012, Section III.C), albeit with the goal of more effectively delivering fuel into the mainstream flow of the engine. Based on the data presented in Figure 5.11a, the results of Mitani et al (1999), Tanimizu et al (2009), andTurner (2010) and the preceding discussion, it is recommended here that some research effort be focussed on reducing inlet viscous drag, with particular emphasis on the suitability and performance of multiporthole injector arrays, similar to that studied by Pudsey et al (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%