2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow rate distribution of cracked hydrocarbon fuel in parallel pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fu et al studied the flow maldistribution of aviation kerosene without pyrolysis in two helical tubes, and proposed that density variation is the key factor to influence the flow distribution under supercritical pressure . Qin et al and Jiang et al conducted simulation and experimental study on the flow maldistribution of mild‐cracking hydrocarbon fuels without coking in two parallel tubes, and proposed that the higher pressure suppresses the mal‐distribution . Jiang et al conducted a parametric study on the manifold of fuel‐cooled plate without reactions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fu et al studied the flow maldistribution of aviation kerosene without pyrolysis in two helical tubes, and proposed that density variation is the key factor to influence the flow distribution under supercritical pressure . Qin et al and Jiang et al conducted simulation and experimental study on the flow maldistribution of mild‐cracking hydrocarbon fuels without coking in two parallel tubes, and proposed that the higher pressure suppresses the mal‐distribution . Jiang et al conducted a parametric study on the manifold of fuel‐cooled plate without reactions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat transfer efficiency has thus become the key factor affecting the thermal protection. However, dramatic changes in properties when hydrocarbon fuel experiences the pseudo-critical temperature during the cooling [9] may lead to severe heat transfer deterioration [10][11][12][13] and the structure may get over-temperature, which is unacceptable. For another, at a certain local high heat flux zone, for example, the cavity, heat flux can be as high as 3MW /m 2 , which is a serious challenge for thermal protection [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%