2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-016-0507-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow velocity tolerance of lowland stream caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera)

Abstract: The process of macroinvertebrate drift in streams is characterized by dislodgement, drift distance and subsequent return to the bottom. While dislodgement is well studied, the fate of drifting organisms is poorly understood, especially concerning Trichoptera. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the ability of six case-building Trichoptera species to return to the stream bottom under different flow velocity conditions in a laboratory flume. The selected species occur in North-West European … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giller et al 1991;Scrimgeour et al 1988;Robinson et al 2003). It is generally accepted that the effects of spates depend greatly on the taxon, as taxa have different resistance (ability to tolerate disturbance) and resilience to flow (ability to recover after a disturbance) (Death 2008;De Brouwer et al 2017). This study provided initial indication that the resistance to peak discharge of invertebrates not only depends on the taxon, but also varies between life stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Giller et al 1991;Scrimgeour et al 1988;Robinson et al 2003). It is generally accepted that the effects of spates depend greatly on the taxon, as taxa have different resistance (ability to tolerate disturbance) and resilience to flow (ability to recover after a disturbance) (Death 2008;De Brouwer et al 2017). This study provided initial indication that the resistance to peak discharge of invertebrates not only depends on the taxon, but also varies between life stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As a result, 3 out of the 10 non-neutral loci (loci 56, 89, and 254) showed good model prediction performance (AUC > 0.7), whereas the other 7 non-neutral loci could not be well-modeled. The reason why we could not build a good model for the 7 non-neutral loci is probably because the natural selection on these loci was driven by the other environmental factors which were reported in other studies but not included in our analysis (e.g., velocity, chl-a) (Brouwer, Bessee-Lototskaya, ter Braak, Kraak, & Verdonschot, 2017;Li et al, 2016;Watanabe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be explained by natural selection at these seven loci being driven by environmental factors not included in our analysis (e.g. velocity and chlorophyll a) (Watanabe et al 2014, Li et al 2016, Brouwer et al 2017). RF is recommended for future studies including huge numbers of environmental variables to assess their effects on adaptive divergence because RF can perform well with large numbers of variables (Genuer et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%