2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flowability of steel and tool steel powders: A comparison between testing methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow of a powder is a complex phenomenon that is sensitive to properties of the powder itself and external factors such as humidity. Within the powder, many parameters affect flow properties 11 . The main influencing factors are particle size and particle shape and shape and width of particle size distribution 12–15 .…”
Section: Theoretical Background—characterization Of Flow Properties O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow of a powder is a complex phenomenon that is sensitive to properties of the powder itself and external factors such as humidity. Within the powder, many parameters affect flow properties 11 . The main influencing factors are particle size and particle shape and shape and width of particle size distribution 12–15 .…”
Section: Theoretical Background—characterization Of Flow Properties O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various parameters for describing the flow properties of a bulk material and a number of measurement techniques. Marchetti and Hulme‐Smith 11 give a classification of flowability testing methods. There is a need in industry for a quick and reproducible method of measuring the flowability of bulk solids 18,19 …”
Section: Theoretical Background—characterization Of Flow Properties O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of the powders to flow was determined by means of diverse indicators such as the flow rate, Hausner ratio, basic flowability energy (BFE), compressibility (CPS), major principal stress (MPS), angle of internal friction (AIF), flow factor (FF), angle of repose, specific energy (SE), and the unconfined yield stress (UYS). The interested reader could find further details about the powder testers and the different parameters in (Marchetti and Hulme-Smith, 2021;Schwedes, 2003;Castellanos et al, 2004;Lettieri and Macrì, 2016). Marchetti and Hulme-Smith (2021) demonstrated the existence of correlations between these different parameters to characterize powder flow.…”
Section: A Brief Critical Review On Powder Flowability Testersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader could find further details about the powder testers and the different parameters in (Marchetti and Hulme-Smith, 2021;Schwedes, 2003;Castellanos et al, 2004;Lettieri and Macrì, 2016). Marchetti and Hulme-Smith (2021) demonstrated the existence of correlations between these different parameters to characterize powder flow. They reported that, for cohesive powders, the Hall and Carney funnels are blocked, while the flowability indicator for these devices is the flow rate.…”
Section: A Brief Critical Review On Powder Flowability Testersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation