Flowering Plant Species to Be Included Into the Third Edition of the Red Book of Saratov Region

Arkhipova, E. A.; Boldyrev, V. A.; Bulanaya, M. V.; Bulany, Yu. I.; Grebenyuk, S. I.; Davidenko, O. N.; Давиденко, Т. Н.; Kostetsky, O. V.; Lavrentiev, M. V.; Mayevski, V. V.; Nevskiy, S. A.; Панин, А. В.; Reshetnikova, T. B.; Sedova, O. V.; Stepanov, M. V.; Stukov, V. I.; Khudyakova, L. P.; Shevchenko, E. N.; Shilova, I. V.

doi:10.18500/1816-9775-2016-16-3-303-309

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When working with rare plant species, using morphometric methods can be significant in obtaining information about the biology of their local populations (Zlobin et al, 2013). Such an approach allows us to avoid any impact on individuals while studying protected species, such as Hedysarum grandiflorum Pallas, 1773 -calciphilous everlasting taproot caudex polycarpic, listed in the Red Books of the Russian Federation (2008) and the Saratov region (2006) with category 3 and the status of the rare species, recommended for inclusion in the next edition (Arkhipova et al, 2016). In addition, we need to study and clarify the features that are informative for the taxonomy of the genus Hedysarum and determination of the viability of the H. grandiflorum cenopopulations according to the previously proposed criteria (Lavrentiev, 2016 a;.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent decades the interest to the study of Hedysarum has increased. Researchers touched upon the classical issues of morphology and variability of external features of H. grandiflorum (Ilyina, 2005(Ilyina, , 2006Avdeyev, Ryazanova, 2008;Lavrentiev, 2016 b;Suprun, Schanzer, 2017) and other species of Hedysarum (clarified morphology (Zubairova, Anatov, 2012;Belous, Zinner, 2013;Syeva, Mandaeva, 2013;Zhmud, 2013;Dural, Citak, 2015), existing species are more accurately separated (Zvyagina et al, 2016), describes the morphology of new species (Bidarlord et al, 2015;Dehshiri, Goodarzi, 2016;Liu et al, 2017;Başköse et al, 2018;Nafisi et al, 2019), including rare ones (Haidar, Qaiser, 2018)) and providing no detailed descriptions (Golovanov et al, 2018;Abbas et al, 2019). The information for full and clear separation of species, subspecies and hybrids of the intricate genus Hedysarum has not been gathered so far.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Variability of Morphological Characteristics of Hedysarum grandiflorum (Fabaceae, Dicotyledones) in Various Ecological Conditions of the Southern Volga Upland

Лаврентьев

Boldyrev

2020

Povolžskij èkologičeskij žurnal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent decades the interest to the study of Hedysarum has increased. Researchers touched upon the classical issues of morphology and variability of external features of Hedysarum grandiflorum and other species of Hedysarum (to clarify morphology, to more accurately separate existing species, to describe the morphology of new species, including rare ones) providing almost no detailed descriptions. The paper provides information about the morphology of external features of H. grandiflorum in the Southern Volga Upland. The study was conducted in 2007–2018. We have studied 23 H. grandiflorum cenopopulations in habitats with various environmental conditions, where more than 600 counting sites were laid, and concluded that the morphological features of H. grandiflorum are rather variable and the values of morphometric parameters are higher in the northeastern part of the study area. The well-being of the population is achieved due to some heterogeneity in the size of individual plants and by means of suppressing the growth and size of separate cenopopulations. The decrease in the parameters of signs is often associated with a higher anthropogenic load. Dimensional indicators of individuals from the cenopopulations of the species studied depend on the thickness of soil, which decreases from fescue-feather grass to petrophyte steppes. Cluster analysis has allowed us to divide the cenopopulations into southern, northern and northeastern ones, and those with anthropogenic impact. The least variable and most informative morphological features of H. grandiflorum (in the descending order of importance) are: the length of the standard, the diameter of the caudex, the plant height, the number of foliole pairs, the number of inflorescences, the number of leaves, the length of the unpaired foliole, the number of flowers on the inflorescence, the length of leaves and the width of the unpaired foliole. In the overwhelming majority of the plants encountered, all the petals of the corolla were of uniform light yellow color, turning into a white tint to the edges of the petals. In some cenopopulations, the corolla can be colored differently and unevenly, especially at the keel. Approximately 0.3% of individuals of the corolla petals and/or the lower part of the keel and/or veins are light blue or light pink, less than 0.07% has a light magenta or even light purple tint of the veins of the carina, edges of the petals or the whole corolla. Similar individuals are found in other regions. Many scientists noted this peculiarity a long time ago and had already described this phenomenon as a color variation (for example, H. grandiflorum var. violaceum) or less often, as a subspecies (for example, H. grandiflorum ssp. argenteum). Individuals with recessive coloring of the corolla from the area of study are called intraspecific color variations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%