Recent innovations in cell biology and imaging approaches are changing the way we study cellular stress, protein misfolding, and aggregation. Studies have begun to show that stress responses are even more variegated and dynamic than previously thought, encompassing nano-scale reorganization of cytosolic machinery that occurs almost instantaneously, much faster than transcriptional responses. Moreover, protein and mRNA quality control is often organized into highly dynamic macromolecular assemblies, or dynamic droplets, which could easily be mistaken for dysfunctional Baggregates,^but which are, in fact, regulated functional compartments. The nano-scale architecture of stressresponse ranges from diffraction-limited structures like stress granules, P-bodies, and stress foci to slightly larger quality control inclusions like juxta nuclear quality control compartment (JUNQ) and insoluble protein deposit compartment (IPOD), as well as others. Examining the biochemical and physical properties of these dynamic structures necessitates live cell imaging at high spatial and temporal resolution, and techniques to make quantitative measurements with respect to movement, localization, and mobility. Hence, it is important to note some of the most recent observations, while casting an eye towards new imaging approaches that offer the possibility of collecting entirely new kinds of data from living cells.
StressProtecting the cell from protein-associated damage is a matter of having the correct proteins at the right place at the right time: the cellular environment changes rapidly in different folding and stress conditions in order to avoid catastrophic consequences of too many misfolded polypeptides or not enough functional proteins. When a cell is exposed to stresses such as heat-shock, cold-shock, osmotic stress, starvation, or amino-acid analogues which cause rampant mutations, the cellular response propagates across the entire network of protein biogenesis.Although much research has focused on how these stresses affect protein synthesis, we are only now beginning to look closely at how stress effects protein localization and distribution. Whereas expression takes time, and is more difficult to accomplish under stress, protein localization is substantially more dynamic and therefore changes in protein distribution can be affected quickly, in time to deal with the stress. Hence, regulation of protein distribution deserves careful attention in the study of stress response. Indeed, recent work has shown that in the single cell eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae more than half of the proteome radically changes its localization under different stress condition (Breker et al. 2013). By altering the spatial positioning of proteins, cells can change Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article