1989
DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(89)90071-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuation in grip and pinch strength among normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability seen in the repeat testing component of our study compared favorably with previous studies. Young et al, 15 using the hydraulic Jamar dynamometer, repeat tested 95 healthy adults, reporting within-subject variability between 19.2% to 23.7%, and Lagerstrom and Nordgren 11 reported the within-subject variability of the Grippit dynamometer to be within 1% to 5%, and interrater repeatability to be 12.9% (Ϯ5.1%). In this study, the Grippit showed better reliability than did the Jamar for healthy subjects, but it showed greater variability between volunteers with arthritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The variability seen in the repeat testing component of our study compared favorably with previous studies. Young et al, 15 using the hydraulic Jamar dynamometer, repeat tested 95 healthy adults, reporting within-subject variability between 19.2% to 23.7%, and Lagerstrom and Nordgren 11 reported the within-subject variability of the Grippit dynamometer to be within 1% to 5%, and interrater repeatability to be 12.9% (Ϯ5.1%). In this study, the Grippit showed better reliability than did the Jamar for healthy subjects, but it showed greater variability between volunteers with arthritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This may be another factor accounting for the differences between the British and American norms. 30 Some limitations were noted while completing this study. Volunteers were not selected randomly and, although attempts were made to select a cross-section of participants, it is not known if the sample represents the United Kingdom as a whole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lebel et al (1996Lebel et al ( , 1998 reported decreased handgrip strength with increasing hair mercury levels in women. Considering that grip strength can dier for the same individual between dierent trials (Young et al 1989), the one time evaluation done in the present study may account for a non-representative state of the actual individual grip strength. This could explain the dierence between the results of the present and previous studies, where the average of two trials for each participant was the outcome measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%