2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-007-0118-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuations of eigenvalues and second order Poincaré inequalities

Abstract: Abstract. Linear statistics of eigenvalues in many familiar classes of random matrices are known to obey gaussian central limit theorems. The proofs of such results are usually rather difficult, involving hard computations specific to the model in question. In this article we attempt to formulate a unified technique for deriving such results via relatively soft arguments. In the process, we introduce a notion of 'second order Poincaré inequalities': just as ordinary Poincaré inequalities give variance bounds, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
263
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
263
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , n (compare with Lemma 5.3 in Chatterjee [3]). In particular, Corollary 3.5 combined with Proposition 3.7 yields the following.…”
Section: First Example: Monotone Gaussian Functional Nite Casementioning
confidence: 78%
“…. , n (compare with Lemma 5.3 in Chatterjee [3]). In particular, Corollary 3.5 combined with Proposition 3.7 yields the following.…”
Section: First Example: Monotone Gaussian Functional Nite Casementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Similarly, (11.5) was shown to hold jointly over e, see [30,Remark 1.4]. In these works, the space is the discrete lattice Z d , d ≥ 3, and a key assumption is that the probability measure has an underlying product structure which makes available tools such as concentration inequalities, the Chatterjee-Stein [9,10] method of normal approximation and the Helffer-Sjöstrand representation of correlations [26,39,32]. Each of these papers makes essential use of, and refines, the optimal quantitative estimates first proved in [19,20,16].…”
Section: Informal Heuristics and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wish to prove (1.5) and (1.6). Our proof will be based on the following proposition, which is a version of Theorem 2.2 in [4] and Theorem 3.1 (and Remark 3.6) of [12], stated in a form that is convenient for our purpose.…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 12mentioning
confidence: 99%