Bioproducts
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0002455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluidized bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To facilitate the design and operation of attached growth bioreactors, mathematical models have been developed that simulate substrate utilization and biomass growth in biofilms (Rittmann and McCarty, 1980a;Shieh and Keenan, 1986). One of the difficulties in using these models, however, is estimating the biokinetic parameters for bacterial growth and substrate removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate the design and operation of attached growth bioreactors, mathematical models have been developed that simulate substrate utilization and biomass growth in biofilms (Rittmann and McCarty, 1980a;Shieh and Keenan, 1986). One of the difficulties in using these models, however, is estimating the biokinetic parameters for bacterial growth and substrate removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 2500-3500 carbon particles (BacMu, Kureye, Japan) of 5.075 × 10 −4 (±5 × 10 −6 ) m diameter with a density of 1400 kg/m 3 were placed in the reactor before the start up of the system. The DFBBR system was designed in accordance with experience's detailed in the literature and presented schematically in Figure 1 Tanyolaç, 1996, 1994;Shieh and Keenan, 1986). The temperature of fluidized bed reactor was controlled at 25 ± 1°C by heating strips placed over the outer surface of the fluidized bed.…”
Section: Differential Fluidized Bed Biofilm Reactor (Dfbbr) Runsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howell and Atkinson (1976) previously indicated that biofilm surface substrate concentration effected biofilm density. Also, in some literature studies, biofilm density was introduced as a function of hydrodynamic properties of the bioreactor (Chang et al, 1991;Shieh and Keenan, 1986). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, entrapment requires specialised chemicals such as bioglues, which can prove too expensive. Apart from the membrane bioreactors, there are several other types of biofilm reactors such as the fluidised bed biofilm reactor (FBBR, [8][9]) and packed bed reactor [10]. Both types of reactors have been proven to offer a high biomass holdup which enables high liquid throughputs and high residence time using the natural cell immobilisation and have been found to be successful for both aerobic and anaerobic cultures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%