1983
DOI: 10.1063/1.1137488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence lifetime resolution with phase fluorometry

Abstract: A phase fluorometer for the measurement of fluorescence lifetimes was constructed from commercially available components. The instrument was tested by using optical delays of 4 and 2 cm, showing an accuracy of 10 ps. Lifetimes, as short as 0.3 ns, obtained by the quenching of fluorescein by KI, were analyzed with a standard deviation of 3 ps. The lifetime resolving power was checked using mixtures of acridine and quinine–sulphate and least-squares fitting procedures. Accurate amplitude ratios were obtained wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why image accumulation is needed is the considerably weak excitation light, which is limited by the efficiency of nonlinear wavelength conversion (typically 10%) in the PPLN crystal and signal loss (typically 1%) in the VIPA. Considering the total power of excitation light (242 μW) at the focus and the number of 2D image pixels (149 × 200 = 29,800 pixels), the excitation power per pixel was only 8 nW, which is much lower than that in the conventional PM method (typically on the order of microwatts) ( 10 , 11 ) or FIRE ( 20 22 ). Since the image SNR in the proposed system was shot noise–limited, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason why image accumulation is needed is the considerably weak excitation light, which is limited by the efficiency of nonlinear wavelength conversion (typically 10%) in the PPLN crystal and signal loss (typically 1%) in the VIPA. Considering the total power of excitation light (242 μW) at the focus and the number of 2D image pixels (149 × 200 = 29,800 pixels), the excitation power per pixel was only 8 nW, which is much lower than that in the conventional PM method (typically on the order of microwatts) ( 10 , 11 ) or FIRE ( 20 22 ). Since the image SNR in the proposed system was shot noise–limited, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fluorescence lifetime can be measured by the time-correlated single-photon counting (TC-SPC) method with pulsed excitation ( 4 , 8 , 9 ) or the phase measurement (PM) method with sinusoidal excitation (see Fig. 1, A and B , with the description in Materials and Methods) ( 4 , 10 , 11 ). Since both methods are based on point measurement, mechanical scanning of the focal point is necessary for obtaining an image using fluorescence lifetime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in practice the fitting sensitivity of modulation depth measurements is lower than that of phase delay [32]. Moreover, for our system, the modulation depth is also more sensitive to losses due to the detector frequency response and AOD diffraction efficiency, and thus less accurate than phase measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5 Self-referenced m ethods based on phase uorimetry have been described. These m ay use measurem ents at multiple frequencies 6,7 or m easurements of both phase and demodulation information at a single frequency. 8,9 Dual lifetime referencing (DLR) also exploits large lifetime differences between the reference and the analytesensitive molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%