SINCE the publication by Papanicolaou and Traut (1943) of the now famous monograph on the cytological diagnosis of cervical carcinoma, interest in exfoliative cytology has increased steadily, till now there is an insistent demand from both the medical and the lay public for a cytological service for women at risk of cervical carcinoma. Should such a service be provided and continue to spread, it would seem desirable that the vaginal and cervical smears obtained should be used, if possible, to diagnose other tumours of the female genital tract. The most important of these apart from ovarian tumours which exfoliate cells into the vagina rarely, is cancer of the endometrium.Vaginal smears have been used extensively in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer (Ayre, 1951 ;Jordan, Bader and Nemazie, 1956; von Haam, 1958; Mezzandra and Terzano, 1958), but relatively few workers report a degree of accuracy comparable with that of the cytodiagnosis of cervical carcinoma (Varangot et al., 1954;Wachtel, 1958;Graham, 1963). According to Boddington and Spriggs (1965), whose own false negative rate is reported as 72%, cytological methods have not proved very useful in this condition. McClaren (1963) concurs with this opinion but points out that " just occasionally, however, cytology may be of value, for example in finding unsuspected endometrial cancer cells in a woman in her early 40's suffering from prolonged menstrual bleeding. This is, in a sense, a cytological ' pick-up ' for the clinician does not always plan immediate curettage, he might for example, recommend that the patient has a few weeks rest and observation bringing her back, of course, for review".A number of reasons have been put forward to explain the failure of the cytodiagnosis of endometrial cancer. To begin with, the recognition of malignant endometrial cells in the vaginal smear is a genuine instance of " exfoliative cytology " in contradistinction to the diagnosis of squamous carcinoma in the generally used cervical scrape smear which is more akin to a study of tumour impressions. Berg and Durfee (1958) claim that no cells reach the vaginal pool in a quarter of the cases. In those cases, where the cells do appear, their recognition is difficult because the cells are inconspicuous (Berg and Durfee, 1958;Koss and Durfee, 1961), difficult to distinguish from histiocytes and the smaller endocervical cells (Horava et al., 1961 ;Wachtel, 1964), invariably associated with large numbers of polymorphs (De Brux, 1958), degenerate rapidly (Pundel, 1958;Graham, 1963), and are frequently obscured by red blood cells. The blood and debris may interfere with " clear cut cytologic evidence " even in cases of advanced endometrial carcinoma (Koss and Durfee, 1962).