2011
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.28.001864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence microscopy three-dimensional depth variant point spread function interpolation using Zernike moments

Abstract: In three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy the point spread function (PSF) changes with depth, inducing errors in the restored images when these variations are neglected during the deconvolution of thick specimens. Some deconvolution algorithms have been developed to take the depth variations of the PSF into consideration. For these algorithms, the accuracy of the estimated structures depends on the knowledge of the PSF at various depths. We propose an alternative to measuring all required PSFs at different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It drastically improves the performance of algorithms. For instance, in 3D fluorescence microscopy, the authors of [39,32,4,50] proposed to approximate PSFs by anisotropic Gaussians and assumed that the Gaussian variances only vary along one direction (e.g., the direction of light propagation). The separability assumption implies that both the PSF and its variations are separable.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It drastically improves the performance of algorithms. For instance, in 3D fluorescence microscopy, the authors of [39,32,4,50] proposed to approximate PSFs by anisotropic Gaussians and assumed that the Gaussian variances only vary along one direction (e.g., the direction of light propagation). The separability assumption implies that both the PSF and its variations are separable.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorescence microscopy analysis was performed using an OLYMPUS BX51 wide field microscope, which was modified to acquire 3D-images using computational optical sectioning, as described by previous users (Maalouf et al 2011). Acquisitions are possible in either white-light or epifluorescence mode.…”
Section: Fluorescence Microscope Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated improved techniques for large field‐of‐view, three‐dimensional (3D) imaging of in vivo specimens at a great depth (Kobat et al ., ; Schroeder et al ., ; Crosignani et al ., ; Zong et al ., ; Glancy et al ., ). However, achieving high spatial fidelity in the obtained biological structures is still a challenge due to the distortion of the point‐spread function (PSF) of the microscope, the inhomogeneity of tissue and immersion media (Boutet de Monvel et al ., ; de Monvel et al ., ; Von Tiedemann et al ., ), and most importantly, spatially varying distortion resulting from different specimen structures across the imaging field (Booth et al ., ; Dong et al ., ; Arigovindan et al ., ; Maalouf et al ., ; Temerinac‐Ott et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies have demonstrated improved techniques for large field-of-view, three-dimensional (3D) imaging of in vivo spec-Correspondence to: Li-Yueh Hsu, DSc, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health Bldg 10, Rm B1D416, MSC 1061, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-1061, U.S.A. Tel: (301) 435-5839; fax: (301) 402-2389; e-mail: lyhsu@mail.nih.gov imens at a great depth (Kobat et al, 2009;Schroeder et al, 2011;Crosignani et al, 2012;Zong et al, 2014;Glancy et al, 2014). However, achieving high spatial fidelity in the obtained biological structures is still a challenge due to the distortion of the point-spread function (PSF) of the microscope, the inhomogeneity of tissue and immersion media (Boutet de Monvel et al, 2001;de Monvel et al, 2003;Von Tiedemann et al, 2006), and most importantly, spatially varying distortion resulting from different specimen structures across the imaging field (Booth et al, 2002;Dong et al, 2003;Arigovindan et al, 2010;Maalouf et al, 2011;Temerinac-Ott et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%