Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo

Chatzistavrou, Evangelia; Eliades, Theodore; Zinelis, Spiros; Athanasiou, Athanasios E.; Εliades, George

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.030

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They also revealed the lack of any fluoride uptake in the deeper enamel after 6 months in the oral cavity 43) . This finding corroborates the results of the current study wherein FVII exhibited the highest average nanohardness in the superficial layer of the enamel, but this decreased in the deeper layers compared with the resin sealants.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants with regard to fluoride-release and anti-demineralization efficacy on adjacent unsealed enamel

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compared resin-based and glass ionomer sealants with regard to their fluoride-release behavior and anti-demineralization potential on adjacent unsealed enamel surfaces. Sealant cavities prepared on bovine enamel blocks were filled with fluoride-containing resin sealants [TeethmateF-1 (TF), Clinpro TM (CP)], and glass ionomer sealant [Fuji VII (FVII)]. Specimens were then incubated in artificial saliva for 14 days to measure fluoride. Thereafter, demineralization was performed for 10 days, and the anti-demineralization efficacy was assessed by Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography (SS-OCT), and cross-sectional nanohardness. All data were statistically analyzed by using ANOVA. FVII exhibited the highest fluoride release. SS-OCT and nanohardness findings indicated that anti-demineralization efficacy of TF was the greatest, whereas FVII was not significantly different from that of CP. Resin sealants released a lower amount of fluoride but exhibited anti-demineralization effects on the adjacent unsealed enamel surfaces that were comparable to that of a glass ionomer sealant.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants with regard to fluoride-release and anti-demineralization efficacy on adjacent unsealed enamel

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this study a scanning with the electron microscope for teeth was performed in order for better detection of demineralization which was done also by Chatzistavrou et al (2010) 24 , Wagner and Szepietowska (2013) 35 as the scanning by electron microscope had the ability to examine the enamel surface efficiently.…”

Section: Volume 50 -December 2016mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different fluoride releasing bonding agents in preventing of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets

Mohamed

Refaat

Morcos

2020

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Compare the effect of different fluoride releasing bonding agents in prevention of enamel demineralization around the orthodontic brackets. Materials and methods: 100 premolar used, these premolars were bonded by 5 bonding agents which were: group 1: Twenty brackets were bonded by Transbond XT adhesive (control group). group 2: Twenty brackets were bonded by Transbond plus color change adhesive. group 3: Twenty brackets were bonded by Transbond XT and covered by Fluoride. group 4: Twenty brackets were bonded by GC Fuji ORTHO lC. group 5: Twenty brackets were bonded by Ketac Cem, subjected to pH cycle for 21 days at room temperature then examined by visual examination and examined by electron microscope. Results: Fuji Ortho showed the least demineralization while composite (Transbond XT showed the most one in demineralization of teeth. Conclusion: Fuji Ortho L.C bonding agent showed the highest property in preventing of demineralization during orthodontic treatment.

show abstract

“…There are several forms of delivering topical fluoride during orthodontic treatment, which include toothpastes, mouthrinses, gel, varnishes, fluoride-releasing materials, such as bonding materials and elastics 1,3,4,24 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of resin-modified glass ionomer and topical fluoride on levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva and biofilm adjacent to metallic brackets

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decalcification of enamel during fixed orthodontic appliance treatment remains a problem. White spot lesions are observed in nearly 50% of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. The use of fluoride-containing orthodontic materials has shown inconclusive results on their ability to reduce decalcification. The aims of this investigation were to compare the levels of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in saliva and biofilm adjacent to orthodontic brackets retained with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Fuji ORTHO LC) and a light cured composite resin (Transbond XT), and to analyze the influence of topical application of the 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) on SM counts. In a parallel study design, two groups (n=14/15) were used with random allocation and high salivary SM counts before treatment. Biofilm was collected from areas adjacent to the brackets on teeth 13, 22, 33, and 41. Both saliva and biofilm were collected on the 7th, 21st, 35th, and 49th days after appliance placement. Topical fluoride application was carried out on the 35th day. Bonding with RMGIC did not alter SM counts in saliva or biofilm adjacent to the brackets. On the other hand, the biofilm adjacent to brackets retained with composite resin showed a significant increase in SM counts along the trial period. Topical application of 1.23% APF did not reduce salivary or biofilm SM counts regardless of the bonding material. In conclusion, fluoride topical application did not show efficacy in reducing SM. The use of RMGIC as bonding materials allowed a better control of SM cfu counts in dental biofilm hindering the significant increase of these microorganisms along the trial period, which was observed in the biofilm adjacent to the composite material.

show abstract

Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo

Cited by 21 publications

References 35 publications

Comparison of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants with regard to fluoride-release and anti-demineralization efficacy on adjacent unsealed enamel

Comparison of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants with regard to fluoride-release and anti-demineralization efficacy on adjacent unsealed enamel

Effect of different fluoride releasing bonding agents in preventing of enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets

Influence of resin-modified glass ionomer and topical fluoride on levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva and biofilm adjacent to metallic brackets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About