Exposure to nickel-containing orthodontic appliances may cause intra-or extraoral allergic reactions. Nickel is the most typical antigen implicated in causing allergic contact dermatitis, which is a Type IV delayed hypersensitivity immune response. This report presents an unusual reaction to nickel during the orthodontic treatment of an adult female patient. The patient had no previous history of allergy and had been wearing fixed metal upper appliances while in orthodontic treatment to assist the eruption of her impacted teeth. The adverse hypersensitivity reactions appeared only after the surgical exposure and included severe signs of eczematic and urticarial reactions of the face with redness, irritation, itching, eczema, soreness, fissuring, and desquamation as well as intraoral diffuse red zones. Diagnostic patch testing performed by the allergist revealed sensitization to nickel (ϩϩϩϩ score). Treatment was achieved with nickel-free appliances. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:186-192.)

The noncleft member of a discordant monozygotic pair has a number of facial characteristics that differ from the general population. These may predispose to the formation of a cleft lip or palate and may result from a deficiency or distortion of the mesenchyme that forms the craniofacial structures.

No abstract

The cephalometric prediction of orthognathic treatment outcome is an important part of the surgical planning and the process of informed consent. The orthodontic and surgical changes must be described accurately prior to treatment in order to assess the treatment's feasibility, to optimize case management and to increase patient's understanding and acceptance of the recommended treatment. The aim of the present article was to investigate on the factors that could influence the accuracy of cephalometric prediction in planning orthognathic surgery. Review of the literature revealed that, besides factors directly related to the prediction method and its use, there exist a considerable number of factors which could affect significantly the accuracy of soft tissue response. These factors could be biological ones such as relapse, centre of mandibular rotation and individual variation in response to treatment and others such as gender, race, pre-operative soft tissue thickness and data bases for mean ratios of soft to hard tissue movement changes. Some of the factors affecting the accuracy of prediction of soft tissue response following orthognathic surgery are inevitable and there are others, difficult to control and predict. However, patients should be informed that predictions are only a guide, may not represent the actual result of the surgical outcome, and as such they should be implemented.

SummaryBackground/Aim: Noonan syndrome (NS) is an autosomal dominant disorder, caused by mutations on genes located on the long arm of chromosome 12. The condition has no sex or race predilection and its incidence is 1 per 1,000 – 2,500 live births. Individuals affected with Noonan syndrome have distinctive facial features, hypertelorism, short stature, congenital heart disease; mainly pulmonary stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, chest deformities, variable learning disabilities and mental retardation. Orofacial findings in Noonan syndrome may be high-arched palate, micrognathia, dental malocclusion and articulation difficulties.Case report: The present article reports on a male case of 12 years old, referred for treatment in the orthodontic office. Despite the difficulties of hyperactivity, the light mental delay and the gag reflex, the treatment was completed satisfactorily with fixed orthodontic appliances in 15 months. Both the patient and his parents were happy with the results. The patient is presently undergoing the retention period of this orthodontic treatment.Conclusions: Despite the difficulties of treating a child with a genetic syndrome for his/her malocclusion, the reported case presented in this article proves that it is always worth trying for the benefit of the patient.