Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive

Mazzaoui, S. A.; Burrow, Michael F.; Tyas, Martin J.

doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00003-8

Cited by 61 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They suggested that resin adhesive should be used to reduce marginal leakage of RMGICs. Mazzaoui et al 36 showed that a thin layer of dentine bonding adhesive covering significantly decreased the amount of fluoride released from both GIC and RMGIC. It did not however block it totally and fluoride continued to be released from the RMGIC through the layer of resin.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice

Roberts¹,

Attari²,

Sherriff³

2005

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To prospectively report on the survival of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), photac-fil and pre-formed stainless steel crown (SSC) restorations in primary molar teeth placed over a seven-year period in a specialist paediatric dental practice under private contract of remuneration. Method All primary molar restorations placed by a specialist paediatric dentist over a seven-year period were reviewed and the outcome results recorded. Data were recorded at review visits until June 30, 2003. Data recorded included Class I restorations, Class II restorations and SSC. The Class II cavities were either mesial or distal, with or without buccal/palatal extensions. If both proximal surfaces were decayed or if after cavity preparation the resultant outline form was significantly larger than the minimal classical form, RMGIC was not used; an SSC was placed instead. Stainless steel crown preparation followed conventional guidelines. The crowns were cemented with reinforced zinc oxide and eugenol (Kalzinol). The status was recorded as satisfactory restoration, tooth exfoliated, tooth extracted for orthodontic reasons with the date of extraction, or needing replacement. If replaced then the reason for replacement was also recorded. Results A total of 544 Class I RMGICs, 962 Class II RMGICs, and 1,010 SSCs were placed. At the last review of each restoration, 98.3% of Class I, 97.3% of Class II RMGICs and 97.0% of SSCs were either satisfactory or withdrawn intact. Conclusion Under the conditions of private specialist practice-based study SSCs continued to prove very successful for the restoration of larger cavities and for pulp-treated primary molar teeth. For the smaller cavities RMGIC were also very successful.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice

Roberts¹,

Attari²,

Sherriff³

2005

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[3][4][5][6] However, restorations employing these resin materials require adhesive systems for bonding to dentine and it has been reported that the use of an adhesive system suppresses fluoride release from fluoride-releasing resin composites. 7,8 Furthermore, the additional use of an intermediary adhesive resin layer in glass ionomer cement restorations decreased the depth of fluoride uptake in dentine. 9 These reports suggest that the use of adhesive systems in combination with fluoridereleasing restorations may reduce the caries inhibition effect by reducing the fluoride release.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine

Itota

Nakabo

Narukami

et al. 2005

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Measurement of released fluoride ions from the cured adhesive materials was carried out according to the previous studies 20,22,23) . Twelve disk specimens (6 mm in diameter and 1 mm in thickness) were prepared from SB, BF, SB/NaF and BF/NaF (n=4 for each combination) by placing the material into a custom silicone cylindrical mold.…”

Section: Fluoride Ion Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dentin bonding performance and interface observation of an MMA-based restorative material

Shinagawa

Inoue

Nikaido

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate bonding performance and dentin interface acid resistance using a 4-META/MMA-TBB based restorative material (BF) compared to a conventional 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement (SB), and the effect of sodium fluoride (NaF) addition to the materials. Dentin surfaces were treated with 10% citric acid-3% ferric chloride (10-3) or 4-META containing self-etching primer (TP), followed by application of BF or SB polymer powders with or without NaF, to evaluate microtensile bond strength (µTBS) in six experimental groups; 10-3/SB, 10-3/BF, TP/SB, TP/BF, TP/SB/NaF and TP/BF/NaF. SEM observation of the resin-dentin interface was performed after acid-base challenge to evaluate interfacial dentin resistance to acid attack. TP/BF showed highest µTBS, while NaF polymers decreased µTBS. TP/BF showed funnel-shaped erosion at the interface, however, NaF polymers improved acid resistance of interface. In conclusion, BF demonstrated high µTBSs and low acid-resistance at the interface. NaF addition enhanced acid resistance but decreased µTBS.

show abstract

Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive

Cited by 61 publications

References 25 publications

The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice

The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice

Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine

Dentin bonding performance and interface observation of an MMA-based restorative material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About