2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorinated PDMS membrane with anti-biofouling property for in-situ biobutanol recovery from fermentation-pervaporation coupled process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicated that the pure SA membrane could no longer effectively separate ethanol and water, and be used in the esterification reaction. 40 M-2 presented impressive ethanol dehydration performance compared with the pure SA membrane. 41,42…”
Section: Effect Of Reactant Molar Ratio On Conversionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It indicated that the pure SA membrane could no longer effectively separate ethanol and water, and be used in the esterification reaction. 40 M-2 presented impressive ethanol dehydration performance compared with the pure SA membrane. 41,42…”
Section: Effect Of Reactant Molar Ratio On Conversionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Introduction of POSS into a polysiloxane pervaporation membrane allows a simultaneous increase in the selectivity by a factor of 2.2 and in the permeability by a factor of 3.8, compared to the initial PDMS membrane [92]. Zhu et al [144] note that, in butanol production in a pervaporation membrane bioreactor, introduction of fluorinated fragments into the material of polysiloxane membranes considerably reduces their plugging and enhances the stability of transport properties. The development of such membranes will allow passing to commercial implementation of the integrated fermentation-pervaporation process.…”
Section: Separation Of Liquids: Pervaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ butanol recovery during the fermentation process is a technicallysuccessful but economically-and energetically-questionable option. Different butanol separation operations especially adsorption (Yang et al, 1994), liquidliquid extraction (Teke and Pott, 2020), pervaporation (Azimi et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020), and gas stripping (Xue et al, 2013a), were evaluated for butanol recovery. In a comparative study on in-situ butanol recovery technologies, Groot et al (1992) found the pervaporation and liquidliquid extraction more promising.…”
Section: Mainstream Processmentioning
confidence: 99%