2013
DOI: 10.1144/sp387.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluvial architecture and connectivity of the Williams Fork Formation: use of outcrop analogues for stratigraphic characterization and reservoir modelling

Abstract: This study addresses the stratigraphic architecture and connectivity of fluvial sandstones of the Williams Fork Formation through outcrop analysis, and static and dynamic modelling of equivalent reservoirs in the Piceance Basin, Colorado. The Williams Fork Formation is a succession of fluvial channel sandstones, crevasse splays, floodplain mudstones and paludal coals that were deposited by meandering-and braided-river systems within coastal-and alluvial-plain settings.Three-dimensional (3D) static and dynamic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fielding & Crane (1987) used a published sandstone-body size database compilation to determine optimal well spacing in subsurface fluvial successions. Pranter & Sommer (2011) and Pranter et al (2013) used fluvial sandstone-body outcrop data from the Upper Cretaceous Williams Fork Formation to constrain static and dynamic reservoir models of the outcrop analogue to investigate connectivity patterns and optimum well density. Keogh et al (2014) collected qualitative and quantitative outcrop analogue data from the Lourinhã Formation (Portugal) at multiple scales with a goal to build integrated geomodels ranging from lithofacies to reservoir scale in support of Statfjord late-life field management (Norwegian Continental Shelf).…”
Section: Fluvial Depositional Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fielding & Crane (1987) used a published sandstone-body size database compilation to determine optimal well spacing in subsurface fluvial successions. Pranter & Sommer (2011) and Pranter et al (2013) used fluvial sandstone-body outcrop data from the Upper Cretaceous Williams Fork Formation to constrain static and dynamic reservoir models of the outcrop analogue to investigate connectivity patterns and optimum well density. Keogh et al (2014) collected qualitative and quantitative outcrop analogue data from the Lourinhã Formation (Portugal) at multiple scales with a goal to build integrated geomodels ranging from lithofacies to reservoir scale in support of Statfjord late-life field management (Norwegian Continental Shelf).…”
Section: Fluvial Depositional Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers cover a range of clastic depositional environments from fluvial (Alsop et al 2013;Pranter et al 2013;Rittersbacher et al 2013;Keogh et al 2014;Nordahl et al 2014) through paralic (Massey et al 2013;Rarity et al 2013) to deep marine (Eschard et al 2013). Two deal with LiDAR and virtual outcrop techniques from a ground base (Rarity et al 2013) and from a helicopter platform (Rittersbacher et al 2013); ground-based LiDAR was also used by Keogh et al (2014).…”
Section: Current Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This choice of net reservoir rock implies that crevasse-splay sandstones would not contribute to flow (cf. Pranter et al 2014). Horizontal variations in NTG ratio are shown for each 'window' in Figure 6, together with the position of photographic logs and the measured section at Link Canyon ( Fig.…”
Section: Variations In Ntg Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors that influence the connectivity of channelized fluvial sandbodies include: (1) the NTG ratio; (2) the width and thickness of the sandbodies; (3) plan-view geometry of the sandbodies, which is typically considered in terms of sinuosity and range of sandbody orientations; (4) the organization of sandbody stacking; and (5) the sandstone content of crevasse-splay and other non-channelized floodplain deposits (Allen 1978;Leeder 1978;Bridge & Leeder 1979;Allard & HERESIM Group 1993;Jones et al 1995;North 1996;Ainsworth 2005;Larue & Hovadik 2006;Donselaar & Overeem 2008;Pranter & Sommer 2011;Pranter et al 2014). Reservoir modelling studies have typically assumed a combination of deterministic stratigraphic layering (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%