2006
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2005.864280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux Dynamics in Inhomogeneous Bulk Superconductor During Pulsed Field Magnetization

Abstract: The inhomogeneous distribution of critical current density in a bulk superconductor is one of the most important properties for understanding the pulsed field magnetization method (PFM). In this paper the flux dynamics in the bulk superconductor during pulsed field magnetization (PFM) were studied by a three-dimensional finite element method considering the inhomogeneous distribution of critical current density.Index Terms-Bulk superconductor, finite element method, pulsed field magnetization (PFM), transient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhomogeneities occur during the growth process of c-axis seeded, single grain (RE)BCO bulk superconductors, resulting in the formation of growth section regions (GSRs) and growth sector boundaries (GSBs), as shown in figure 2, with a higher J c for the GSBs in comparison with the GSRs [98,[109][110][111]. These play a significant role in the magnetization of these materials, particularly for the PFM technique, where they can affect the magnitude and shape of the trapped field and the maximum temperature rise, and different results are observed in comparison to FC and ZFC, particularly for lower applied fields [104].…”
Section: Inhomogeneities In (Re)bco Bulk Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inhomogeneities occur during the growth process of c-axis seeded, single grain (RE)BCO bulk superconductors, resulting in the formation of growth section regions (GSRs) and growth sector boundaries (GSBs), as shown in figure 2, with a higher J c for the GSBs in comparison with the GSRs [98,[109][110][111]. These play a significant role in the magnetization of these materials, particularly for the PFM technique, where they can affect the magnitude and shape of the trapped field and the maximum temperature rise, and different results are observed in comparison to FC and ZFC, particularly for lower applied fields [104].…”
Section: Inhomogeneities In (Re)bco Bulk Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, and for most standard cases, the equation for J c is relatively easy to introduce into a model once the dependence on magnetic field, temperature and position is known [108]. The role of inhomogeneities in the PFM process has been analysed numerically in [90,98,99,114]. In [90], a model is presented based on the three-dimensional (3D) FEM H-formulation [75,77,90,115], but in principle, as described in Section 2.2, other formulations are interchangable.…”
Section: Inhomogeneities In (Re)bco Bulk Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electric field involved when measuring the commonly used E-J power law is usually around 10 -6 V cm -1 at J c [10], and a typical power law of J 20 would imply a resistivity that is many orders of magnitude larger than the normal state resistivity which must be an upper limit. Thus the electric field generated in a PFM process is in a completely different regime from that in an E-J characterisation, which is beyond any reliable experimental results that are currently available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations were also carried out to study the electromagnetic properties in an inhomogeneous bulk. Ohsaki et al investigated the magnetic flux motion in bulk superconductor during PFM using the given angled or cos curve model [21,22]. To understand the magnetic flux dynamics mechanism and temperature rise in the bulk superconductor, the simulation was performed by assuming that the critical current density in the GSBs was four times higher than that in the GSRs [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%