1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.46.8434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux phases in thet-Jmodel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
141
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
141
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A particularly interesting case is the cuprate high-temperature superconductors, where the parent and SC phases do not appear to coexist but the phase competition is actually intensified by the emerging of a "strange metal" normal state with pseudogap opening at a temperature T * well above T c in the underdoped regime [5]. The origin of the pseudogap has been controversial, being attributed to preformation of Cooper pairs [16][17][18][19][20][21] or a hidden CO such as d-density wave (DDW) [22][23][24][25][26][27], spin-density wave (SDW) [28][29][30][31], loop-current [32], nematic or stripe order [33][34][35][36][37][38], and pair density wave [39,40], etc. It has been observed that upon doping, T * decreases gradually in the normal state above the T c dome, and enters into the SC dome near the optimal doping level at x OP .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly interesting case is the cuprate high-temperature superconductors, where the parent and SC phases do not appear to coexist but the phase competition is actually intensified by the emerging of a "strange metal" normal state with pseudogap opening at a temperature T * well above T c in the underdoped regime [5]. The origin of the pseudogap has been controversial, being attributed to preformation of Cooper pairs [16][17][18][19][20][21] or a hidden CO such as d-density wave (DDW) [22][23][24][25][26][27], spin-density wave (SDW) [28][29][30][31], loop-current [32], nematic or stripe order [33][34][35][36][37][38], and pair density wave [39,40], etc. It has been observed that upon doping, T * decreases gradually in the normal state above the T c dome, and enters into the SC dome near the optimal doping level at x OP .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normal state Fermi surface at doping x = 0.12 for this dispersion is shown in Fig.1. The mean-field parameters χ 0 , ∆ 0 and the chemical potential µ for different dopings are obtained from a self-consistent calculation [17]. It has been shown [8,18,19] that the inclusion of the AF fluctuation correction is necessary to account for some of the spin and charge dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the slave-boson approach to the t − t ′ − J model [8,17], the physical electron operators c iσ are expressed by slave bosons b i carrying the charge and fermions f iσ representing the spin; c iσ = b + i f iσ . In the SC state, we consider the order parameters ∆ ij =< f i↑ f j↓ − f i↓ f j↑ >= ±∆ 0 with the d-wave symmetry and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SC phase [26][27][28][29][30][31][32], the mean-field Hamiltonian is obtained by decoupling the spin-spin interaction term S i · S j into pairing and direct hopping terms [30], and choosing the mean-field…”
Section: B Superconducting Phasementioning
confidence: 99%