2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2003.00682.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flycatcher song in allopatry and sympatry – convergence, divergence and reinforcement

Abstract: The theory of reinforcement predicts that natural selection against the production of unfit hybrids favours traits that increase assortative mating. Whether culturally inherited traits, such as bird song, can increase assortative mating by reinforcement is largely unknown. We compared songs of pied (Ficedula hypoleuca) and collared flycatchers (F. albicollis) from two hybrid zones of different ages with songs from allopatric populations. Previously, a character divergence in male plumage traits has been shown … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
144
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
144
4
Order By: Relevance
“…When introgression occurs, the species exchange one component (genes) but not the other (song). In this respect they differ from some other species where hybrids sing elements of the songs of both of the parental species (43,55). Thus in contrast to many other species of birds the defining feature of a population of Darwin's finches is a cultural learned signal.…”
Section: Implications For Speciationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…When introgression occurs, the species exchange one component (genes) but not the other (song). In this respect they differ from some other species where hybrids sing elements of the songs of both of the parental species (43,55). Thus in contrast to many other species of birds the defining feature of a population of Darwin's finches is a cultural learned signal.…”
Section: Implications For Speciationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…When closely related species come into contact, courtship signals could diverge as a consequence of reproductive character displacement (Grant and Grant, 2010;Kirschel et al, 2009;Seddon, 2005), or converge when there is no selection against heterospecific copying (Haavie et al, 2004;Laiolo, 2012;Secondi et al, 2003;Sorjonen, 1986;Tobias and Seddon, 2009;Vokurková et al, 2013). We currently lack a mechanistic explanation for these contrasting patterns of song divergence versus convergence; the presence or absence of early song discrimination could be one such mechanism that determines whether cultural traits diverge or converge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both species are sexually dimorphic in plumage and males of the two species differ in plumage characters (Svensson 1992) and song (e.g. Haavie et al 2004), both of which are important in species recognition (Saether et al 1997;Wiley et al 2005;Qvarnström et al 2006). Males generally arrive at the breeding grounds a week earlier than females (Pärt & Gustafsson 1989) and start to defend a territory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%