2020 5th International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/atsip49331.2020.9231946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

fMRI Imaging Based Human Brain Parcellation Methods: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the atlas-based approach, the whole brain is parcellated into spatially discrete regions based on either the sulcal and gyral landmarks (e.g., automated anatomical labeling; Tzourio-Mazoyer et al, 2002) or probabilistic maps, and each region is taken as a node in the graph. In recent years, the boundary between the atlas-based and datadriven approaches has become blurry due to more advanced methodologies employed in the resting-state fMRI analysis to parcellate the brain into finer divisions of cortical areas (Cohen et al, 2008;Gordon et al, 2016;Schaefer et al, 2018;Wig et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2016;Yeo et al, 2011; and see the review of Abdedayem et al, 2020). These recent maps yield more reliable and neurobiologically meaningful parcellations of cortical areas.…”
Section: The Basics Of Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the atlas-based approach, the whole brain is parcellated into spatially discrete regions based on either the sulcal and gyral landmarks (e.g., automated anatomical labeling; Tzourio-Mazoyer et al, 2002) or probabilistic maps, and each region is taken as a node in the graph. In recent years, the boundary between the atlas-based and datadriven approaches has become blurry due to more advanced methodologies employed in the resting-state fMRI analysis to parcellate the brain into finer divisions of cortical areas (Cohen et al, 2008;Gordon et al, 2016;Schaefer et al, 2018;Wig et al, 2014;Xu et al, 2016;Yeo et al, 2011; and see the review of Abdedayem et al, 2020). These recent maps yield more reliable and neurobiologically meaningful parcellations of cortical areas.…”
Section: The Basics Of Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atlas-based approaches are widely used and typically segment the brain by applying a predefined anatomical template on the input image and generating a set of regions over associated template. Despite the popularity of these methods, there are drawbacks [14,39]. Obviously, these methods rely heavily on the given template and do not take natural variance of the brain into account for different subjects beyond the geometric warping of the fixed atlas into a standardized space using either voxelbased or surface-based approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%