Focus Group Data Saturation: A New Approach to Data Analysis

Abstract

The qualitative research “gold standard” for quality research is data saturation. The limited literature on reporting data saturation and transparency in qualitative research has supported an inconsistent research standard suggesting researchers have not adequately reported data saturation to promote transparency (O’Reilly & Parker, 2012). Confusion regarding how to analyze qualitative data to achieve data saturation, how to write clear qualitative research findings, and present these findings in a usable manner continues (Sandelowski & Leeman, 2012). A phenomenological asynchronous online focus group using WordPress® was employed to answer the research question. Based on the current literature on the topic of focus group data saturation, the study findings were analyzed by group, individual, and day of the study. Additionally, the data was presented in a chart format providing a visible approach to data analysis and saturation. Employing three different methods of data analysis to confirm saturation and transparency provides qualitative researchers with different approaches to data analysis for saturation and enhancement of trustworthiness. Placing data in a visual configuration provides an alternative method of presenting research findings. The data analysis methods presented are not meant to replace existing methods of achieving data saturation but to provide an alternate approach to achieving data saturation and reporting the findings in a clear, usable format.

A Vision of Future Healthcare: Potential Opportunities and Risks of Systems Medicine from a Citizen and Patient Perspective—Results of a Qualitative Study

“…The conversation content was transcribed according the simple transcription rules by Dresing et al (2015) [ 72 ]. At least two focus groups were planned in each sample group until thematic saturation was achieved, i.e., no new categories emerged from the data [ 73 , 74 ].…”

The Implementation of Permenpan-RB No 29/2011 in Crisis Management of Government Public Relations

“…Adopting Ethics, Musa, and Alkassim (2016), it is permissible to use the principle of convenience, which includes researchers' access, geographical proximity, availability of time, and subject's willingness to be involved in research objectives. The licensing process until the interview took January 2017-August 2017 and was carried out in stages using the saturation principle (Hancock, Amankwaa, Revell & Mueller, 2016), where researchers conducted interviews with some of the most easily contacted informants in advance, if it was deemed to be lacking in data then the researcher would look for other informants by asking permission. After the data was sufficient, the researcher decided not to do the interview again.…”

Inductive teaching approaches in business English writing in an EFL context: Paper-based and product-based instructions

“…Data saturation was the other technique employed in the current study to enhance the trustworthiness and credibility of the findings. This technique is regarded as the "gold standard" (Hancock et al, 2016) for analyzing qualitative data, enhancing the credibility of the research findings. In the current study, data saturation was achieved through focused-group discussions, in which questions were structured to facilitate asking different participants.…”