2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4794-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms using zTE MRA as compared with TOF MRA: a preliminary image quality study

Abstract: • Various MRA sequences were applied for follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms. • zTE MRA was less sensitive to susceptibility artefacts and haemodynamics. • In this monocentric study, zTE MRA was equivalent to DSA. • zTE MRA maybe an alternative to TOF MRA for follow-up assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with 6 years of experience), blinded to the findings of the posttreatment follow‐up MRA/CTA/DSA, independently reviewed the BBMRA results, and rated the visualization of the aforementioned arterial segments using a 4‐point grading scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor (nondiagnostic). The degree of treatment‐related susceptibility artifacts was also evaluated using 4‐point grading scores: 4, no susceptibility signal loss; 3, mild signal loss; 2, moderate signal loss; 1, severe signal loss that prevented image assessment . Subsequently, the same observers compared BBMRA and the baseline pretreatment DSA/CTA and assessed the presence and degree of vasospasm in each arterial segment using a 3‐point scale: 1 (0–33% stenosis), 2 (34–66% stenosis) and 3 (67–100%) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with 6 years of experience), blinded to the findings of the posttreatment follow‐up MRA/CTA/DSA, independently reviewed the BBMRA results, and rated the visualization of the aforementioned arterial segments using a 4‐point grading scale: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; and 1, poor (nondiagnostic). The degree of treatment‐related susceptibility artifacts was also evaluated using 4‐point grading scores: 4, no susceptibility signal loss; 3, mild signal loss; 2, moderate signal loss; 1, severe signal loss that prevented image assessment . Subsequently, the same observers compared BBMRA and the baseline pretreatment DSA/CTA and assessed the presence and degree of vasospasm in each arterial segment using a 3‐point scale: 1 (0–33% stenosis), 2 (34–66% stenosis) and 3 (67–100%) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Subsequently, the same observers compared BBMRA and the baseline pretreatment DSA/CTA and assessed the presence and degree of vasospasm in each arterial segment using a 3-point scale: 1 (0-33% stenosis), 2 (34-66% stenosis) and 3 (67-100%). 20,21 After the interrater agreement was evaluated, the disagreement was resolved by consensus. For the presence of vasospasm, grades 2 and 3 were considered positive, regardless of the patient's symptoms.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I n the follow-up after the endovascular treatment of a cerebral aneurysm, the precise visualization of the shape of the neck and dome with/without remnants from coiling is necessary. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] X-ray DSA is a reference standard to examine the above-described configuration, but it is invasive and presents certain risks related to the catheter procedure, contrast media, and radiation. 2,[5][6][7]9,10 As a noninvasive substitute for DSA, 3D TOF-MRA with/without contrast media is widely used, but this method presents some difficulty regarding magnetic susceptibility artifacts from the coils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] X-ray DSA is a reference standard to examine the above-described configuration, but it is invasive and presents certain risks related to the catheter procedure, contrast media, and radiation. 2,[5][6][7]9,10 As a noninvasive substitute for DSA, 3D TOF-MRA with/without contrast media is widely used, but this method presents some difficulty regarding magnetic susceptibility artifacts from the coils. 2,4,5,[7][8][9][10][11] With some recent advances in MR imaging, it has been speculated that silent MRA with zero-TE and arterial spin-labeling tagging may overcome the above problems by delineating flowing blood at the neck with minimal artifacts from metal substances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation