Followers' moral judgments and leaders' integrity-based transgressions: A synthesis of literatures

Krylova, Ksenia O.; Jolly, Phillip M.; Phillips, James S.

doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.002

Cited by 24 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 103 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More recently, Grover et al (2017) further indicated that severity of a violation carries much weight when it comes to restoring trust in leader–follower relationships. Ultimately, as Krylova et al (2017) recently stated in their review of literature on the subject, “…not all integrity-based transgressions are created equal” (p. 199), so considerations of severity, intentionality, and methods of delivery of responses all matter.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Denial and Empathy: Partners in Employee Trust Repair?

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior research on trust repair has focused primarily on investigating verbal responses to breaches of trust. Although consistently implicated in violations, the role of affect in the repair process has been mostly ignored. Using a scenario-based paradigm, we conducted an experimental study to examine the value of mistrusted party’s empathy, specific responses to an integrity-based violation (apology vs. denial), and nature of consequences (personal vs. organizational), as well as their interactive effects, on trust repair. Consequently, we sought to merge work on verbal responses with affect. Major findings indicated that presence of mistrusted party’s empathy functioned to repair trust better than its absence and, when coupled with a denial of culpability, produced markedly increased perceptions of violator’s integrity. These findings contribute to our understanding of how leaders influence followers through affect, informing both emotion and trust theory.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Denial and Empathy: Partners in Employee Trust Repair?

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Means, someone integrity will make other people trust. The integrity is presumed to be linked to numerous values-related constructs including ethnics, morality, honesty, and sincerity (Krylova et al, 2017). Those ethnics, morality, honesty, and sincerity related to effective leadership.…”

Section: Integrity Is the Most Important Thing In Regional Head Nomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Over 100 years, leadership research has yielded a strong evidence (Behrendt, Matz, & Göritz, 2017). Some of the unique challenges faced in leading research studies (Divala, Mungwira, & Laufer, 2015), (Chabeli, Malesela, & Nolte, 2016), (Matei & Camelia, 2016), (Krylova, Jolly, & Phillips, 2017), (Kairouz, El, & El, 2016) were discussed about integrity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quest Back about The Integrity of Incumbent Regional Head to be Nominee in Different Region

Purba

Martono

Setiawati

2018

j. humanities. natural sciences. Information Science. Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regional head and vice regional head are selected to be a leader in Indonesian region as Indonesian Local Government Law. In their campaign, they promote their visions, missions, and work program if they were selected as regional head and vice regional head. In fact, they nominate and nominated to be a regional head candidate and vice regional head candidate in the same region and even different region for the next election before they were able to prove their integrity in their promises. Whereas, their integrity is a guarantee for democratic goals to local autonomy implementation the region got. It caused by the legal vacuum as found in this issue. The study recommends a legislation revision for Article 7 of 10th Governor, Regent, and Mayor Election Law of 2016, the pairs of regional head candidate requirement should have a specific provision that the newly elected regional head an/or vice regional head cannot be a nominee as regional head candidate and/or vice regional head candidate before their length of service is finished.

show abstract

“…There is only one major review that has focused on leader transgressions (Krylova, Jolly, & Phillips, 2017) and no reviews, as far as we know, that address follower transgressions nor, importantly, on both leadership and followership perspectives. The review of leader transgressions by Krylova et al (2017) focused solely on integrity-based transgressions and adopted mainly a leader-centric view of transgressions. Krylova et al (2017) specifically reviewed the literature on leader's integrity-based wrongdoing and subsequent damage to followers' trust and moral identity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The review of leader transgressions by Krylova et al (2017) focused solely on integrity-based transgressions and adopted mainly a leader-centric view of transgressions. Krylova et al (2017) specifically reviewed the literature on leader's integrity-based wrongdoing and subsequent damage to followers' trust and moral identity. In doing so, they synthesized existing research on integrity-based wrongdoing with the experimental philosophy literature on moral cognition (e.g., Cushman, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leader-follower transgressions, relationship repair strategies and outcomes: A state-of-the-science review and a way forward

Epitropaki

Radulovic

Ete

et al. 2020

The Leadership Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

show abstract

Followers' moral judgments and leaders' integrity-based transgressions: A synthesis of literatures

Cited by 24 publications

References 103 publications

Denial and Empathy: Partners in Employee Trust Repair?

Denial and Empathy: Partners in Employee Trust Repair?

Quest Back about The Integrity of Incumbent Regional Head to be Nominee in Different Region

Leader-follower transgressions, relationship repair strategies and outcomes: A state-of-the-science review and a way forward

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About