2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Following nanomedicine activation with magnetic resonance imaging: why, how, and what’s next?

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large quantum yields for triplet state formation and the characteristic reactivities of the different excited-state configurations offer the opportunity to rationally design transition metal complexes with desirable photobiological mechanisms that are simply not possible with organic photosensitizers. The most studied transition metal complexes for this purpose are based on Pt(IV), Ru(II), and Rh(III), [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] followed more recently by Ir(III), 60,61 and finally Os(II). 62 The mode of light-controlled cytotoxicity generally falls into one of the following categories: (1) photosensitization reactions that involve ROS (PDT), (2) photosensitization reactions that do not involve ROS, (3) photothermal processes (photothermal therapy, PTT), and (4) photodissociation reactions involving the metal or photocleavage reactions on the ligand.…”
Section: Transition Metal Complexes As Photoactive Anticancer Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The large quantum yields for triplet state formation and the characteristic reactivities of the different excited-state configurations offer the opportunity to rationally design transition metal complexes with desirable photobiological mechanisms that are simply not possible with organic photosensitizers. The most studied transition metal complexes for this purpose are based on Pt(IV), Ru(II), and Rh(III), [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] followed more recently by Ir(III), 60,61 and finally Os(II). 62 The mode of light-controlled cytotoxicity generally falls into one of the following categories: (1) photosensitization reactions that involve ROS (PDT), (2) photosensitization reactions that do not involve ROS, (3) photothermal processes (photothermal therapy, PTT), and (4) photodissociation reactions involving the metal or photocleavage reactions on the ligand.…”
Section: Transition Metal Complexes As Photoactive Anticancer Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field is too large to cover in a single review, but a few recent accounts have covered a lot of ground. [53][54][55][56][72][73][74][75] For this review, we have focused on a few examples to demonstrate the structural features that control the nature of the lowest-energy triplet excited states in Ru(II) complexes (see Chart 1 and the corresponding jablonski diagrams in Scheme 3). We also limit the discussion to the family of tris-bidentate diimine chelates of Ru(II), of which our own TLD1433 is a member, and the aspects of designing these complexes.…”
Section: Selected Examples Of Ru(ii)-based Transition Metal Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more recent alternative to PDT is photoactivated chemotherapy where a standard cancer chemotherapeutic is converted into a light-activatable form. 11,12 A common strategy is to attach the molecule to a photocage, 13 a re-leasable group that blocks the anticancer agent’s activity until illumination. We and others have pursued this strategy by caging conventional anticancer agents such as doxorubicin, cisplatin, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We and others have pursued this strategy by caging conventional anticancer agents such as doxorubicin, cisplatin, etc. 12,1421 Each of these advances has focused on delivery of anticancer agents with moderate cytotoxicity. Release of a more potent drug should enable deeper tissue activation as less efficient release should still lead to the cytotoxic effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%