2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Following the time course of face gender and expression processing: A task-dependent ERP study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural responses around this time have been related to explicit categorization of faces according to gender, familiarity, and group membership (Barrett and Rugg, 1989;Jemel et al, 2009;Olivares et al, 2003;Valdes-Conroy et al, 2014). Taken together, these results suggest information reflecting social connections that is not separable from person identity is present early, potentially contributing to recognition of faces, and that identity-independent information associated with social connections may be a separate process that occurs only after identity representations are processed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Neural responses around this time have been related to explicit categorization of faces according to gender, familiarity, and group membership (Barrett and Rugg, 1989;Jemel et al, 2009;Olivares et al, 2003;Valdes-Conroy et al, 2014). Taken together, these results suggest information reflecting social connections that is not separable from person identity is present early, potentially contributing to recognition of faces, and that identity-independent information associated with social connections may be a separate process that occurs only after identity representations are processed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Face gender could interfere with emotion categorization, but facial emotion did not interfere with gender categorization (Plant et al, 2000; Atkinson et al, 2005). In contrast, Valdes-Conroy et al (2014) found a facial emotion × face gender interaction in error rates in the gender categorization task and in the components of event-related potentials (N170) in the emotion categorization task. Whether the facial emotion × face gender interaction is symmetric or asymmetric is determined by stimulus set size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These average male and female faces were presented in gray scale. The facial images comprised a neutral facial expression because emotional expressions appear to interact with face gender perception (Hess et al, 2009; Valdés-Conroy et al, 2014). The occluder was an orthonormal planar surface containing random and irregular holes (Figure 1B), and about 43% of the facial area was visible through its holes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%