2017
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnx099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foncteurs Faiblement Polynomiaux

Abstract: Important motivations of this paper come from the homology of congruence groups and of subgroups IA of the automorphisms of free groups, whose functorial study is part in a natural way of this formalism. These two examples are studied in section 5. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 1 we give the definitions of strong polynomial functors and weak polynomial functors and give them properties. In Section 2 we show that the notion of strong polynomial functors can be described in terms of cross effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(80 reference statements)
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polynomial functors were originally defined using cross effects for functors with domain category a monoidal category with the unit 0 a null object (see [32]). Proposition 2.3 in [30] shows that strong polynomiality can also be defined in terms of cross effects, and hence that it is a direct generalisation of the classical notion of polynomiality. Note that if 0 is a null object in C, functors C → A are automatically split, as in that case we have a canonical factorisation id : A → X⊕A → A, natural in A.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Polynomial functors were originally defined using cross effects for functors with domain category a monoidal category with the unit 0 a null object (see [32]). Proposition 2.3 in [30] shows that strong polynomiality can also be defined in terms of cross effects, and hence that it is a direct generalisation of the classical notion of polynomiality. Note that if 0 is a null object in C, functors C → A are automatically split, as in that case we have a canonical factorisation id : A → X⊕A → A, natural in A.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Djament conjectured that the stable degree of H k (GL(R, I); k) is ≤ 2k in [Dja2, Conjecture 1] (also see [DV,§5.2] for further discussion). Part (1) of Application B proves that this stable degree is ≤ 2k + d. Thus, up to an additive constant, Application B establishes this conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition can also be applied to monoidal categories where the monoidal unit is a null object. Djament and Vespa introduce in [7] the definition of strong polynomial functors for symmetric monoidal categories with the monoidal unit being an initial object. Here, the category Uβ is neither symmetric, nor braided, but pre-braided in the sense of [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, in Section 2, we introduce the Long-Moody functors, prove Theorem A and give some of their properties. In Section 3, we review the notion of strong polynomial functors and extend the framework of [7] to pre-braided monoidal categories. Finally, Section 4 is devoted to the proof of Theorem B and to some other properties of these functors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%