2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food for thought: Examining the relationship between food thought suppression and weight-related outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
59
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be a chance finding due to multiple testing; however, that this result was demonstrated at all three time points suggests otherwise. Previous studies have reported that food-related thought suppression can result in increased subsequent eating (Erskine 2008;; furthermore, Barnes and Tantleff-Dunn (2010) report a study demonstrating associations between food thought suppression and higher food cravings. It is possible that suppressing thoughts of one appetitive behaviour (smoking) resulted in elevations in another (eating).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This may be a chance finding due to multiple testing; however, that this result was demonstrated at all three time points suggests otherwise. Previous studies have reported that food-related thought suppression can result in increased subsequent eating (Erskine 2008;; furthermore, Barnes and Tantleff-Dunn (2010) report a study demonstrating associations between food thought suppression and higher food cravings. It is possible that suppressing thoughts of one appetitive behaviour (smoking) resulted in elevations in another (eating).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to thought suppression theory, attempts to suppress thoughts often fail and are instead associated with increased unwanted thoughts (Wegner & Zanakos, 1994). Negative food-related cognitions (e.g., negative preoccupation on food, food thought suppression) are associated with binge eating, restraint, and shape and weight concerns (Barnes & Tantleff-Dunn, 2010;Barnes & White, 2010;Tapper & Pothos, 2010). Applying cognitive behavior theory, the dual-pathway model may be enhanced with food-related cognitions as an antecedent to binge eating.…”
Section: Food-related Cognitionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Negative affect was measured with three scales: the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale -Short Form (Andresen, Malmgren, Carter, & Patrick, 1994), the five item Negative Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988), and the 20-item Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (Zung, 1971). Food-related cognitions were measured with two scales: the 15-item Food Thought Suppression Inventory (Barnes & Tantleff-Dunn, 2010) and the 11-item Negative Thoughts subscale of the Food Preoccupation Questionnaire (Tapper & Pothos, 2010). Binge eating was measured with 11 items from the Eating Disorder Inventory -Bulimia Scale and the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overweight and obese community-dwelling adults that endorsed higher levels of food thought suppression tended to also report more frequent binge eating, food craving, and other unhealthy eating-related behaviors [43]. In fact, food-related thought suppression may mediate the relationship between psychological stress and weight cycling in women [44].…”
Section: Experiential Avoidancementioning
confidence: 97%